EAA, AOPA file 3rd Class Medical exemption

The Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA) and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) today jointly filed a request for an exemption with the FAA that, if granted, would give pilots who fly recreationally the option of getting a 3rd class medical or, instead, participating in a recurrent online education program that will teach them how to self-asses their fitness to fly.

The education program will cover aeromedical factors and exceed the training presently mandated by the FAA, EAA and AOPA officials say. Participating pilots would also be required to hold a valid driver’s license and conduct a meaningful self-assessment prior to flight. The self-assessment required in the exemption will be similar to what pilots do now between AME visits. The difference is that pilots will have a higher level of knowledge to do the self-assessment after completion of the required education program, officials note.

The requested exemption would help to mitigate the increased risk inherent in transitioning to unfamiliar and sometimes distinctly different aircraft, which is the only current available alternative to the FAA’s third class medical, AOPA and EAA officials said.

This exemption request has been built upon substantial evidence obtained over the past 20 years, most recently proven through the successful medical safety standards allowed under the sport pilot certificate, which currently utilizes the driver’s license medical standard in lieu of an FAA medical certificate.

In the seven years since the sport pilot driver’s license medical standard was established, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not attributed a single accident in that category to medical deficiency. Interestingly, the majority of accidents involving aircraft eligible under sport pilot is classified by the NTSB as instructional or transition flights, officials said. The jury is in: the sport pilot medical requirement works. The EAA/AOPA exemption request builds on seven years of positive safety data from using driver’s license medical certification with sport pilots, and reduces transition-related safety issues by primarily keeping pilots in familiar aircraft.

The AOPA/EAA-requested exemption would be allowed for use in the particular size of aircraft (single engine, 180 horsepower, fixed gear) and types of operations (day, VMC, one passenger, not for-hire) typically classified as recreational flight.

A 2009 AOPA policy survey found that 72% of the member respondents expressed a strong interest in eliminating the 3rd class medical requirement for pilots flying recreationally.

“This initiative will preserve the freedom to fly by reducing a significant hurdle in the lives of many pilots and entrants into general aviation while maintaining or enhancing safety,” said EAA President Rod Hightower. “It would also greatly increase the number of aircraft available for pilots flying strictly for recreation and encourage pilots to continue to fly in aircraft in which they are already familiar.”

“Our petition offers substantial economic savings to pilots and the U.S. government,” said AOPA President Craig Fuller. “A conservative estimate shows a savings of $241 million for pilots and $11 million to the federal government over 10 years.”

For more information: EAA.org, AOPA.org

 

 

 

People who read this article also read articles on airparks, airshow, airshows, avgas, aviation fuel, aviation news, aircraft owner, avionics, buy a plane, FAA, fly-in, flying, general aviation, learn to fly, pilots, Light-Sport Aircraft, LSA, and Sport Pilot.

Comments

  1. Why are AOPA/EAA trying to create yet another type of flight classification – ‘recreational’. Why limit the 3rd class medical to just a particular size of aircraft (single engine, 180
    horsepower, fixed gear) and types of operations (day, VMC, one
    passenger, not for-hire)?

    Simply eliminate the 3rd class medical altogether! We don’t need or want even more granular forms of flight classifications! I personally do not support this silliness! Any flight that is not commercial is personal and whether it is just having one passenger or all seats filled make no difference! Who are we trying to fool here! If I have a 4 place 180hp aircraft I’m going to need a 3rd class medical because I can assure you that at some point I am going to have more than one passenger aboard. Why would I want to expose myself to the possibility of a violation! This type of thing just create an even trickier minefield to navigate in the future.

    Stop trying to create more layers of complexity in our already over complicated world of aviation just to appease the very agency that should be catering to OUR needs as pilots and aircraft owners!

Speak Your Mind

*