A post maintenance flight in a Cessna 210 results in a gear up landing. This YouTube video shows a remarkable landing using only the tail and an extended nose gear.
I don’t think it could have gone better.
A post maintenance flight in a Cessna 210 results in a gear up landing. This YouTube video shows a remarkable landing using only the tail and an extended nose gear.
I don’t think it could have gone better.
That’s an early model strutted 210, 1960. The landing gear is an engine driven hydraulic system with a lot of limit switches for sequencing the doors and gear swing. The limit switches operate solenoids in the hydraulic pack, the sequence is doors open, gear down, doors close, selector handle returns to neutral. This requires limit switches on the three sets of doors for both open and close as well as up lock and down lock for the gear. in 1979 (I think) Cessna removed the doors and eliminated the solenoids, there’s also an STC to remove the doors. A gear failure like this can be from a bad limit switch, solenoid, or insufficient hydraulic fluid. The pilot did make a nice landing, minimal damage to the aircraft.
Great airmanship! I think I would have used the grass.
Wonder why he did not use full flaps, would have slowed his approach speed a lot.
I would disagree about Cessna being the worst gear. True for the hyd. system on the antique 210 but the electric is great.
I wonder if he tried the neg G’s and Positive G’s and all the tricks in the box?
I had a 707 that I could not get a green light for the nose gear and when we went to full flaps ( had been restricted to 20 flaps for noise stage III) it went green. Too bad we had already dumped 10,000 # of Jet A
I’m curious – I met a 210 owner who had a hydraulic failure and he tried for over an hour, pumping, pumping, and the gear finally, ever do gradually, extended and he landed safely (at Palomar, near San Diego). He taxied to his maintenance facility, furious at the poor maintenance, and he was told they only do the landing gear (meaning replacing hydraulic hoses and O rings) when asked to by the owner.
The fact is that the Cessna single engine series have the worst landing gear system of any GA plane. If an O ring pops, or a hose fails, and hydraulic pressure is lost, then the plane is doomed.
I’d like to know the technical details of why the gear failed on this aircraft. I’d also like to see an AD that mandates hose changes periodically – perhaps 5 years?
Not true. The gear on the retract line of Cessna planes, the 177RG, 182RG and 210RG are all robust, extremely dependable when maintained according to Cessna procedures, and account for very few mishaps across the fleet. The statement, “worst landing gear system of any GA plane” is total nonsense.
Again, I disagree. I gather you’ve never opened up a transmission on these things. And any system that has no real manual extension system is junk.
I’ve owned six C177RGs and I know that system intimately, and the 210 has the same hydraulic system – lose an O ring and hydraulic pressure and the plane can’t lower the gear.
You’re entitled to disagree with me but don’t accuse me of “total nonsense’. That is totally inappropriate.
Based on the bow of the gentleman exiting the passenger door, I wonder if he was flying? It was a remarkably good landing; better than many of mine with all three down and locked.
Looks like an ad for a Uvalde conversion. That conversion is less expensive then substantial damage repair.