• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Bill to eliminate medicals for more pilots introduced in Senate

By Charles Spence · March 11, 2014 ·

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Three members of the U.S. Senate introduced a bill Tuesday, March 11, which mirrors one introduced in the House of Representatives last December, which would eliminate the medical requirement for non-commercial pilots flying day VFR below 14,000 feet in aircraft weighing less than 6,000 pounds and carrying no more than six people.

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and Experimental Aircraft Association had petitioned the FAA in 2012 for this rule change. The bills go even further than AOPA and EAA had asked.

Senators who introduced the bill are: John Boozman (R-Ark.), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.). They are members of the Senate GA Caucus. The House bill now has 52 co-sponsors.

Boozman said, “thousand of pilots have asked the FAA to expand the light-sport aircraft medical exemption to cover additional small aircraft.”

If the FAA continues to delay, he added, this bill will start the discussion toward a legislative solution.

With passage of the legislation, pilots will continue to assess their fitness to fly and undergo regular flight reviews with a flight instructor, said Jim Coon, AOPA Senior Vice President of Government Affairs.

“It is good news to see this bill introduced in the Senate,” said Dick Knapinsky of EAA. This might make the FAA move faster, he added.

Representative Todd Rokita (R-Ind), who introduced the bill in the House, expressed his thanks to the Senators for introducing the Senate version of the General Aviation Pilot Protection Act.

“I look forward to working with them to pass this bill in both chambers to spur job growth in the GA industry,” he said.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Pilotman says

    March 26, 2014 at 3:51 am

    Good news for non CPL holders! There is so many private pilots in the US!

  2. Bob says

    March 12, 2014 at 6:18 am

    If you want to get rid of the third class medical, start writing. Letters to your Senators and Representatives may make the difference.

    • LARRY says

      March 12, 2014 at 6:21 pm

      You bet, Bob. I wrote to my Rep in Wisconsin who had not co-signed on HR3708 and … guess what … within that same week, he did. Unless and until each and every pilot does their part and at least tries, the FAA won’t budge.

      They’re under ‘attack’ on SO many issues these days that sooner or later they are going to have to start bowing to public pressure. If not, their own jobs will begin to be in jeopardy.

  3. Otto Keesling says

    March 12, 2014 at 5:55 am

    This is great news let congress make this law.

  4. Mark says

    March 12, 2014 at 5:29 am

    How about expanding it just a bit to include night VFR. I don’t mind not flying IFR, but it would be better not having to rush a cross country to get home before sunset.

    • Tom says

      March 12, 2014 at 11:09 am

      You still have an hour after sunset until the “end of evening civil twilight” or did you need to fly longer than that to avoid “rushing home”?

  5. Mooney says

    March 11, 2014 at 2:50 pm

    Can this be passed before my next unfair FAA gamble? I would much rather spend the unnecessary dollars the FAA forces me to needlessly spend (according to my Board Certified Cardilogis), and spend them on some upgrades for my Mooney which will make for safer flight, something the FAA medical certticiation doesn’t do. It is about time someone puts a premium on training; accidents will drop.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines