Light at the end of a long tunnel of decline

WASHINGTON, D.C. — General aviation might be seeing some light at the end of the long tunnel of decline, according to comments from officials from the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA) at their annual “state of the industry” press conference.

GAMA, which now reports world-wide data, shows that 50% of GA deliveries last year were in North America. GAMA officials note that the Asia-Pacific market is growing, while the European/Middle-East also is improving. Much of the growth, however, has been in the turboprop and pure jet markets. Turbo-props showed a 34% gain over 2013.

The single engine piston market posted a production of 933 aircraft, a slight increase of 2.1% over last year. Piper Aircraft accounted for 154 — 16% — of those 933 planes produced last year. Agricultural aircraft also showed an increase, indicating a growing acceptance of GA’s role in food production.

GAMA executives point to ways they see a brighter future. Steve Taylor, president of Boeing Business Jets and chairman of GAMA, and Pete Bunce, president and CEO of GAMA, said general aviation is getting better acceptance in other parts of the world.

Much of this acceptance is in the business aircraft market, but as this segment grows, the light piston market also should increase.

China is recognizing the importance of general aviation aircraft to serve its many smaller and remote areas and is pushing for more airports and less restrictive regulations.

Manufacturers find the biggest dollar volume in production of corporate aircraft, but expect growth in this market will also result in benefits and growth for light GA planes.

There are at least two reasons for this. First, the current fleet of piston aircraft is 48 years old. They will have to be replaced. Second, efforts to change the certification of aircraft and parts can produce better aircraft at lower cost.

Increased regulations and slow activity by regulators, plus an increase in lawsuits, have cost companies heavily, causing them to increase prices far beyond the rate of inflation. Since 1994, there have been 800 new regulations that manufacturers must meet, GAMA officials said.

In 2007 manufacturers started looking for ways to reduce production costs.

“We wanted to drive down the costs for both the government and industry,” Taylor and Bunce said.

A rulemaking committee was formed and began looking at ways to streamline and standardize regulations. With the FAA, they coined the term “Double the safety at half the cost.”

Manufacturers began working more on Congress. Key legislators were invited to visit plants. General aviation caucuses were formed and today these caucuses have more members than any other groups.

Both political parties passed the Small Airplane Revitalization Act, signed into law last year by the President. This act set specific deadlines for actions to be taken. A deadline of 2015 was set for the FAA to come up with new regulations. GAMA spokesmen said this means the proposals must be finished by the end of this year to enable the FAA to have all of 2015 to process changes through the long government process.

So, is GAMA correct? Are things looking brighter for general aviation? Probably.

However, streamlining regulations is just one of the issues keeping GA busy looking for solutions.

There is also an airport problem. The city of Santa Monica showed this recently when it wanted to close that city’s busy general aviation airport. GA use of airports in busy areas like Atlanta, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and other hub locations might face new and possibly restrictive requirements if NextGen succeeds in making it easier and faster for commercial airlines to get from city to city, further crowding limited airport facilities.

There is a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel, but it will need consistent and persistent efforts to help it glow into the future all pilots want.

Comments

  1. Sam says

    I think the main thing to notice is that the FAA is in the way. Look at the growth in the LSA market compared to GA.

  2. Greg W says

    An article examining the reported registrations of Light Sport and Experimental Amateur-built would be a good addendum to this. The stats. from GAMA do not at all cover many of the volume manufacturers in light general aviation. To be a member of GAMA the company needs a minimum yearly sales record of $2.5 million or more to apply for membership. This restricts membership to mainly turbine manufacturers. For instance Steve Taylor, president of Boeing Business Jets and chairman of GAMA. Remember a B.B.J. is a converted airliner, he may have interest in light aircraft but his “business” is heavy jets, not what most of us think of for General Aviation.

  3. says

    After 47 years of flying it’s pretty clear what has happened to GA. Picture “Gulliver (GA)” on his back with thousands of tiny men (Gov.) stringing threads over his body. As a matter of fact the US looks like this too.

    76 yr. old former CFI

  4. Kent Misegades says

    The Pollyannas at the alphabets dust off the same old rosy reports every year but are blind to the decline in recreational aviation, the bulk of GA and the source for future pilots. It would be interesting to see a statistic of the membership rolls in the EAA and AOPA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *