Pilots asked to comment on Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2

WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), a member of the Senate General Aviation Caucus and certified flight instructor with more than 11,000 hours, has released the outline for the Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2 (PBOR2) and is asking the aviation community to submit comments for the final Senate legislation.

“The first Pilot’s Bill of Rights was a victory for the aviation community and made possible by the support of pilots and industry leaders across the nation,” said Inhofe. “Since its implementation, I have heard from the aviation community that more improvements still need to be made to cut red tape.

Inhofe-020607-18331- 0002“The goal of Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2 is to continue addressing unfair practices and regulations toward the aviation industry. Today I unveiled my draft legislation for how to accomplish this goal, and I am also requesting feedback from the aviation community on how this legislation can best meet their needs and ensure a safe and innovative industry that is free of heavy-handed bureaucracy.”

“We can once again thank Senator Inhofe for bringing key general aviation issues before Congress,” said Mark Baker, president of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA). “This new version of the very popular Pilot’s Bill of Rights comes at a time when the general aviation industry is actively engaged in actions aimed at protecting pilots’ civil liberties and the freedom to fly.”

“This legislation would further enhance the pilot and general aviation reforms introduced in the first Pilot’s Bill of Rights, designed to support and grow the ability for more Americans to participate in flying,” said Jack Pelton, chairman of the board for the Experimental Aircraft Association. “We are pleased to have worked with Senator Inhofe and his staff to identify several key issues that are addressed within this bill, which would ease burdens on average Americans who participate in flying.”

The aviation community is encouraged to submit edits and suggestions to PBOR2 by Aug. 8 here.

Inhofe will also be hosting a forum at 10 a.m. on Aug. 2 at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh to discuss the legislation, receive feedback, and take questions.

The following is a section-by-section summary of PBOR2 draft:

Section 1 – Title. Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2

Section 2 – Language expands the FAA’s 3rd class medical exemption for light sport aircraft to cover most small general aviation (GA) aircraft. It would also prohibit enforcement of violations if FAA has not complied with these provisions within 180 days of enactment.

Section 3 – Language reigns in Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) stops and searches of GA by requiring CBP to follow general law enforcement standards when exercising its powers.

Section 4 – Language provides local airport offices to manage the use of private hangars at airports. Current law gives federal officials and Washington the ability to dictate what does and doesn’t happen inside a hangar; this section changes that problem.

Section 5 – Opens a dialogue on language that will make it easier to install new, safety enhancing equipment on existing aircraft without going through a lengthy, expensive certification process.

Section 6 – Language expands on the Pilot’s Bill of Rights by:

Subsections a-b. – Explicitly states that pilots facing an investigation by FAA can appeal the issue directly to a federal district court for a de novo trial. This provision of the original Pilot’s Bill of Rights has not operated as intended.

Subsection c. – Expands the protections of the Pilot’s Bill of Rights to other certificate holders in the aviation community, such as charter operators or repair stations.

Subsection d. – Requires FAA to provide notification to an individual once they become subject to an FAA investigation; if FAA does not provide notification, they cannot press charges.

Subsection e. – Limits scope of FAA’s document requests of certificate holders to the pertinent issues being investigated.

Subsection f. – Reinstates FAA’s expungement policy, preventing the agency from retaining records of enforcement against an airmen certificate holder after retaining it for 5 years. Also prohibits the retention of records beyond 90 days if the agency does not take enforcement action. Further prevents the FAA from publicizing pending enforcement actions against a covered certificate holder.

Section 7 – Prohibits enforcement of NOTAM violations if FAA has not finished its NOTAM improvement program by the end of the year.

Section 8 – Language requires contract towers and other outsourced FAA programs to be subject to FOIA requests.

Section 9 – Language provides civil liability protection to aviation medical examiners and other FAA reps, treating them as government employees as the proscribed duties are carried out.

A copy of the draft text as of June 30 can be viewed by clicking here.

On Aug. 3, 2012, Inhofe Pilot’s Bill of Rights (S.1335) was signed into law, which made FAA enforcement proceedings and NTSB review fair for pilots; streamlined the NOTAM Improvement Program; and required a GAO review of the FAA’s medical certification process and forms in order to help bring clarity and reduce instances of misinterpretation with medical forms for pilots.

The legislation garnered 65 Senate cosponsors and the endorsement of pilot and actor Harrison Ford.

Comments

  1. Gary says

    When the Sport Pilot Ruling was passed in 2004, it included a clause which disqualified pilots with their latest medical application denied by FAA from flying LSA. It was added by DOT at the last minute. The FAA didn’t even want it !

    This is the well-known CATCH-22 which discriminates against pilots with certain well- managed medical conditions. It is UNFAIR that just because you have a denied medical on file with FAA, but can drive a car down the highway at 70 MPH within close proximity of other “guided missiles” using your state driver’s license, that you are NOT allowed to fly LSA.

    I hope that the Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2: does NOT include any such Catch-22 clause as did the Sport Pilot Ruling. The FAA version of this regulatory issue (which has been delayed for over 2 years now) , must also be FREE from any such Catch-22 discriminating clause attached.

    I commend Senator Inhofe for all his time and effort in this matter.

    Let’s make this legislation in the Pilot’s Bill of Rights 2 a REALITY!

    GA needs more pilots desperately and this would encourage many more pilots to return to flying using a valid state driver’s license as a medical instead of a Class 3 outdated FAA medical certificate.

  2. James Barnett says

    Well written and thought out. It deserves our support. Of course some cash contributing sacred cows will have a little less feed and the barn won’t be as well heated and air conditioned but in the end the entire aviation community and the country will be better and stronger. I’ll gladly do anything I can to support it.
    Jim Barnett

  3. says

    Thank you Senator Inhofe. General Aviation needs more influential people such as yourself to further the goal of enabling GA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *