• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

AOPA cautions against assumptions in PC-12 crash

By Janice Wood · March 24, 2009 ·

The AOPA Air Safety Foundation warned on March 24 that it is “too soon to be making guesses about the cause of Sunday’s accident in Montana,” saying investigators are still in the data collection phase, which is only the first in a long series of steps toward determining a cause.

“It’s important to remember that, except for the extremely rare single-point catastrophic failure, aviation accidents are almost invariably the result of a chain of events and decisions,” said Air Safety Foundation President Bruce Landsberg. “The National Transportation Safety Board is extremely good at accident reconstruction, but it will take months to find, and then unravel, all the links in this accident’s chain.”

National Transportation Safety Board aviation investigations follow “a predictable arc,” he said. First, investigators collect all available information. They speak to any available witnesses, retrieve data on the weather at the time and location of the accident, and learn what they can about the pilot and his or her experience level. In high profile accidents such as Sunday’s, investigators may hold briefings to discuss the information they have collected, which is then collated into a preliminary report.

“The briefings and the preliminary report are nothing more – or less – than a listing of the facts collected,” Landsberg said. “They give no relative weight to any of the facts, nor do they draw any conclusions about possible causes.”

Following the preliminary investigation, NTSB staff members begin a painstaking review of all available evidence. They work with stakeholders such as the aircraft’s manufacturer, to draw on outside expertise. At the end of that exhaustive process, usually six to twelve months after the accident, the staff issues a factual report. The report is given to the Board members themselves, who then determine the probable cause of the accident.

“It is the policy of the Air Safety Foundation and the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association not to comment on a specific accident until the NTSB has issued at least its factual report, and preferably its final report, but we will discuss general information about a type of aircraft or operation,” Landsberg concluded. “Given the complexity of most accidents, we believe that it’s the only prudent approach, and urge others to do the same.”

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Al Beckwith says

    March 25, 2009 at 6:00 am

    We recommend your policy in that we will provide an NTSB Report when the investigation is finalized.

    Al Beckwith
    Commercial Aviation Corp
    AOPA Member since 1952

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines