• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

White House was updating Air Force One file photos

By Janice Wood · April 28, 2009 ·

An Obama administration official explained on April 27 that a presidential Boeing 747 and two fighter jets flew low near “ground zero” in New York City on April 27 because the White House Military Office wanted to update its file photographs of the president’s plane near the Statue of Liberty, according to an Associated Press report.

The un-named official said the White House Military Office told the Federal Aviation Administration that it periodically updates file photographs of Air Force One near national landmarks, such as the statute and the Grand Canyon. The April 27 incident caused a brief panic among workers in Manhattan and Jersey City, many of whom had survived the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Another White House official apologized on CNN after the low-flying 747 and its F-16 escorts frightened workers and residents into evacuating buildings.

The VC-25, as the Air Force calls it, functions as Air Force One when the president is aboard. It was taking part in a classified, government-sanctioned photo shoot, an FAA spokesman said.

“Last week, I approved a mission over New York. I take responsibility for that decision,” Louis Caldera, director of the White House Military Office, told CNN. “While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it’s clear that the mission created confusion and disruption.” He told CNN the White House Military Office was trying to update its file photographs of Air Force One. He said the president was angry when he learned that the flight created panic in New York and New Jersey. The incident outraged many New Yorkers, including Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“First thing is, I’m annoyed — furious is a better word — that I wasn’t told,” Bloomberg said, calling the FAA’s decision to withhold details about the flight “ridiculous” and “poor judgment.”

“Why the Defense Department wanted to do a photo op right around the site of the World Trade Center defies the imagination,” he said. “Had we known, I would have asked them not to.”

USAF Capt. Anna Carpenter, of Andrews Air Force Base where the presidential planes are based, said that New York law enforcement agencies and the FAA had, in fact, been given notice of the exercise; but New York Deputy Police Commissioner Paul Browne emphasized that, while his department had been alerted to the flight by the FAA, it was “with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it.”

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) echoed the Mayor Bloomberg’s sentiments in a news conference of his own, saying the FAA should have notified the public to avoid panic.

“It is absolutely outrageous and appalling to think that the FAA would plan such a photo shoot and not warn the public, knowing full well New Yorkers still have the vivid memory of 9/11 sketched in their minds,” the New York Democrat said. Schumer said the FAA’s decision not to announce the fly-by “really borders on being either cruel or very, very stupid.”

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Kris Anderson says

    April 29, 2009 at 8:09 am

    This article also shows another poor misuse of government funds. If they want to up date their file photos, make ’em do it on the ground instead of wasting manpower and jet fuel.

    “USAF Capt. Anna Carpenter, of Andrews Air Force Base where the presidential planes are based, said that New York law enforcement agencies and the FAA had, in fact, been given notice of the exercise; but New York Deputy Police Commissioner Paul Browne emphasized that, while his department had been alerted to the flight by the FAA, it was “with directives to local authorities not to disclose information about it.”

    Then why the hell did they bother to tell anyone in the first place! Idiots!

    This whole mess could have been avoided if it had never happened. Sure doesn’t help the government’s arguement about businesses and their jets being wasteful. At least the business are being productive and not going on joy-rides.

  2. Ron Sterba says

    April 28, 2009 at 8:10 am

    WELL STAFF A JOB WELL DONE! ENJOYED GOING THRU THE WEB NEWSPAPER COPY. NOT SURE WHAT HAPPENED IN SUN N FUN digital copy with the split screen with the daily icons of the separate days as big as lower section. Maybe me I’am not as bright as the bug on a prop as to see the whole picture but I think you have a great staff. Just remember we old folks started with the LITTLE Rascals and buggie Wheels hence the Bi-Plane! Would you let me know if it was me having the problem or you folks on the split page for sun n fun digital addition..Flight reviews are something we learn from just as you would tell me I was going something wrong on the computer. ITS OK I’ve been flying for 37 years!

    Thanks Ron

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines