• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Flying a new fuel

By Janice Wood · February 8, 2010 ·

Has General Aviation Modifications found the replacement for 100LL? It’s developing a new fuel called G100UL and AVweb’s Paul Bertorelli took a sneak peek last week in a test flight.

The new fuel is made entirely of petroleum components using what GAMI’s George Braly describes as well-known refining techniques, Bertorelli reports.

Find out more here.

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bruce Gustafson says

    February 9, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    WE are using an STC on our Cessna’s that alows us to run 95% ethanol – can run 100% but they need to denature it so the ground crew’s don’t drink it. We are paying $1.50 per gallon this week for fuel and pump it ourselves. Anyone in the Texas area is welcome to come for a flight here in Houston in one of the 5 planes we are running this on.

    We use the planes for survey work and pilot training.

    Bruce Gustafson – 832-326-5367

  2. Dean Billing says

    February 8, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    Neither the reporter nor the GAMI rep seemed to understand the bureaucratic hurdles of getting a new unleaded avgas approved. It cannot be merged into the ASTM spec for 100 LL, D910, because that spec requires some lead. That is why the new 91 UL avgas spec requested by DOD had to go through a new approval process and ended up with a new number. It is also why 94 UL will have a new ASTM number. They are a long way, from approval, unless TEL disappears, which is a good possibility.

    Another interesting catch is that avgas represents just 0.14% of the gasoline production in the US, it was about 186 million gallons in 2008. I’m sure the gasoline industry would love to stop making 100 LL and handling TEL, but as has been pointed out, the gasoline will be an expensive boutique fuel.

    Did everyone catch the reference from the reporter about Swift Fuel that said the economics aren’t “looking too promising”?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines