• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilots tell Congress: We want to be included

By Janice Wood · February 16, 2010 ·

Using the website, LocalAirportsMatter.com, pilots and aviation stakeholders around the country affected by the possibility of losing local air traffic control radar services have sent more than 550 letters to their members of Congress. In keeping momentum going for this issue, they are asking the FAA to be compelled to adopt a transparent, inclusive process before the agency makes any further moves toward changing its facilities, according to officials with the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA).

“Radar’s our eyes when the weather goes down. It’s our way back to the airport to be able to fly and land safely,” said pilot John Defrance, commenting to WYFX-TV in Youngstown, Ohio, on the importance of having a say in any plan that would affect how radar services are provided.

NATCA officials spent much of the last three weeks traveling around Ohio to brief pilots and other local aviation community officials on what they believe is the FAA’s plan in the absence of being included in the process as well. In recent days, NATCA took its briefings to Lansing, Mich., and Grand Rapids, Mich., for meetings with pilots and other stakeholders who expressed their frustration at being shut out of the FAA decision-making process.

“We stand with pilots, airport directors and all local aviation stakeholders who are opposed to the FAA’s moves without having a say in the matter through a collaborative, transparent process,” NATCA Executive Vice President Trish Gilbert said. “We all just want to be heard, to have a voice. For pilots and controllers, safety is everything. Any moves toward changing how we provide safety services today must be done carefully and with full stakeholder involvement.”

The realignment issue involves the FAA closing a local air traffic control radar function, known as TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control), which handles the climb and approach phases of flight within 40 miles of an airport. NATCA has focused on airports in the Dayton, Toledo, Mansfield, Akron, Canton and Youngstown areas of Ohio the past two weeks as that is where the FAA intends to close TRACONs at local airports and move them either to Columbus or Cleveland.

Each facility and sectored airspace is unique, NATCA officials say, noting the only way to determine if the realignment of an air traffic control facility is necessary and appropriate is through the development of a comprehensive plan for each proposed realignment. Controllers, pilots, users, airport directors and all stakeholders must be included throughout the process from inception to implementation, air traffic controllers say, adding the benefits of the realignment must also be clearly defined before the inception of any plan and are agreed to by all stakeholders. Additionally, improving safety, efficiency and services must be the driving force for the realignment, not cost savings, according to NATCA.

For more information: FAA.gov, NATCA.org

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines