• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

GA united on avgas issue

By Janice Wood · September 15, 2010 ·

The general aviation (GA) community is united in responding to the government’s exploration of alternatives for 100 low lead fuel, according to officials with the National Business Aviation Association.

NBAA is part of a coalition of GA and petroleum industry stakeholders that seeks to address concerns about cost, availability and ease of production. Steve Brown, NBAA senior vice president of operations & administration, and Rob Hackman, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association vice president of government relations, talk about the progress the group is making in a recent episode of the NBAA Flight Plan podcast. Listen anytime online at: NBAA.org/flightplan

About Janice Wood

Janice Wood is editor of General Aviation News.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bill Leavens says

    September 16, 2010 at 8:30 am

    Reader Misegades just nailed it. Lead free premium gas already exists in the world and it suits the needs of most small aircraft owners just fine. For years airports had one tank for 100LL and a tank for 80 octane. If and when the higher octane stuff hits the market, those folks with the complicated engines can have their own tank. In the mean time there is an immediate solution for the rest of us if ethanol can be taken out of the mix.

  2. Kent Misegades says

    September 16, 2010 at 3:52 am

    The title should read “GA Alphabet Group Leader are United”; pilots and aircraft owners are not. The alphabets are focused on finding a fuel for aircraft that need 100 octane solutions. They don’t want a sub-octane unleaded fuel that requires expensive modifications to the engines or airframes. What they completely ignore however is the fact that 70% – 80% of all piston engine aircraft and nearly 100% of all new LSAs run just fine on 91 Octane (Premium) ethanol-free Mogas, and these aircraft currently use around 50% of all 100LL. If the alphabets would put as much energy into getting this fuel onto our airfields, they would really help GA, especially all of us who pay our own bills, i.e. non-commercial, the majority of airplanes based at most airport. If 50% of the fuel sold was Mogas, it would not only make a dramatic reduction in the use of leaded fuel (taking the heat off those who seek an alternative 100 octane fuel) but it would also dramatically reduce the cost to fly, train, own aircraft, etc.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines