• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Simulated engine failure gets real

By NTSB · October 31, 2010 ·

This October 2008 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

Aircraft: Piper Tomahawk. Injuries: None. Location: Friant, Calif. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The purpose of the flight was for the student pilot to practice simulated engine failures under the direction of his CFI. The first three simulated engine failures were without mishap. On the fourth attempt the CFI allowed the aircraft to get no more than 100 feet above ground level before calling for a go-around. The student applied full power and pitched the airplane’s nose up, but was not quick enough to keep the airplane from making an unplanned hard landing.

Probable cause: The student pilot’s failure to execute a go-around in timely manner, which resulted in a collision with terrain. Also causal was the instructor’s inadequate supervision of the flight and delayed remedial actions.

For more information: NTSB.gov

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. J. Wilson says

    November 2, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    All that I can say is WOW… You always hear about the boarder line harsh/critical treatment of pilots by the NTSB and the FAA during investigations. In this case, it appears that they allowed an unqualified CFI to continue to jeopardize the safety of more students. The CFI is in control and responsible to maintain safe operation of the aircraft in simulated emergency situations. At no point in time should a simulated emergency, for training purposes, go beyond a margin of safety so critical that the CFI can not regain control and safely recover from the simulation.

    Obviously, maintaining a safe altitude during the simulation was the critical error made by the CFI, not the student.

  2. Dennis Reiley says

    November 1, 2010 at 9:41 am

    The student pilot did nothing wrong! The CFI is always responsible for any mistake a student makes under his wing. The CFI must insure his student is ready for any and all situations he orders or he should not require that situation.

    The NTSB official made a serious error of judgment in the probable cause for this “accident”.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines