• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Prop problem for Kolb

By NTSB · February 17, 2013 ·

Aircraft: Kolb Mark III. Injuries: 1 Minor. Location: Stetson, Maine. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The pilot was in cruise flight at 1,500 feet over a heavily wooded area when the airplane began to vibrate violently, then lost all engine power. He made a forced landing in the trees.

The pilot noted that, about 30 flight hours before the accident, the airplane experienced a similar severe vibration in flight. At that time he shut down the engine and made a successful forced landing to a nearby airport.

Examination of the airplane at that time revealed that a triangle-shaped aluminum plate on the rear of the propeller hub had cracked. The front and rear propeller hubs were replaced by Warp propellers. The pilot installed the propeller hub and same propeller blades on July 10, 2010, and began flying again without any vibrations. The total hours on the propeller blades are unknown.

The post-accident examination at the accident site revealed that both carburetors had separated from the engine assembly and were hanging by their fuel lines and throttle cables. One composite propeller blade was delaminated with a large section missing. The remaining two propeller blades appeared to be intact without comparable or crash-related damage. The carburetor detachment likely caused the final engine failure and this separation was likely a consequence of the severe vibration.

Metallurgical examination of the propeller blades identified that separation of a portion of blade No. 1 initiated as a transverse fracture, originating near the trailing edge of the blade. The transverse fracture was progressive in nature, with the crack propagating in some combination of fatigue and/or stress rupture under continually applied loads. Blade No. 2 also exhibited a pattern of parallel transverse cracks on its aft side. Blade No. 3 was also visibly damaged, with significant de-lamination or disbonding of the woven carbon-fiber composite skin from the forward side of the blade, along with de-lamination at the trailing edge. Blade No. 3 also exhibited a pattern of parallel transverse cracks on its aft side. This damage was consistent with bending of the tip of the blade forward under air loading.

Probable cause: The in-flight failure of the No. 1 composite propeller blade due to fatigue, which resulted in a violent vibration, loss of engine power, and a subsequent forced landing to unsuitable terrain.

NTSB Identification: ERA11LA150

This February 2011 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Ellery Batchelder says

    February 18, 2013 at 4:43 pm

    Warp Drive dont stand behind there props i was the Pilot Of the Kolb that had a Warp Drive Prop failure AND i lost an Airplane because Of there bad prop

  2. Ed Yung says

    February 18, 2013 at 12:07 pm

    Most CFIs stil instruct to go to full carb heat upon reducing power. DANGEROUS. I lost an engine BECAUSE, on a very cold day, the carb heat melted the ice crystals, which refroze in the venturi. I had 300 hours at the time, & in the succeeding 4300 hours I NEVER used carb heat in this dangerous fashion; ONLY if I needed it. I have NEVER lost an engine as a result. Entire sory is given in “Navigate Your Flying Carpet; 38 Ways”, an Amazon Ebook with our family of 6 FLYING a Magic carpet among clouds.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines