• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Senate rejects tower amendment

By General Aviation News Staff · March 21, 2013 ·

A legislative effort to spare 189 contract control towers from closing next month as part of automatic federal budget cuts failed when the Senate refused to take up the issue. According to a story at Bloomberg.com, Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) proposed the amendment, saying he was seeking to protect “the safety of Americans.” He briefly held up a vote on the bill to fund the government through Sept. 30 because an amendment to shield the towers from the spending reductions wasn’t in the package.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Steve says

    March 22, 2013 at 8:15 pm

    “Never let a crisis go to waste”

    Just checked the FAA budget for 2013, it’s 15,000 million dollars. Let’s see, 600 million is less than 5% of their budget. I cant imagine that 5% in waste cant be found somewhere without closing one control tower.

    This is politics in it’s most evil form, these people want fatal accidents for political gain.

  2. John Wesley says

    March 22, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    Actually, 1/2 of the towers in this country could be closed and nobody would notice the difference.

  3. Greg C says

    March 22, 2013 at 5:57 am

    I’m sure some towers are needed; however, there are a number which are not needed. For example, Independence, KS is a good example of an airport not needing a tower. I flew for a week in early March. Monday through Friday during day light hours the tower is manned. Very little traffic was in the area during the time. Saturday morning for my last flight in training and departure later in the day back to New England, the amount of traffic equaled what I had experienced for the whole previous five days. No one was manning the tower and traffic worked together with no compromise to safety. Independence, KS could easily do without a tower.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines