• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fuel exhaustion brings down Pacer

By NTSB · March 24, 2013 ·

Aircraft: Piper Pacer. Injuries: 1 Fatal. Location: Elgin, S.C. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The pilot was on a cross-country flight. While en route, a witness observed an airplane flying at a slow airspeed between 200 and 300 feet above the ground, and noted that the engine was revving up and down as if it was running out of fuel. The nose pitched up, then the airplane went down behind a line of trees where it crashed and exploded in flames.

The post-accident examination revealed the fuel selector was on the right main tank and the tank was out of fuel.

The airplane had two 18-gallon fuel tanks with a total capacity of 36 gallons. The cruise airspeed for the airplane is 126 mph. The straight-line distance from the departure airport to the crash site is 607 miles. According to the engine-operating manual, the engine will burn 7.2 gallons of fuel per hour at 75% power and 6.3 gallons of fuel per hour at 65% power. In a no wind condition at 75% power, it would take four hours and 50 minutes to fly from the departure airport to the accident site. At 65% power it would take five hours and 33 minutes to fly to the accident site. Based on a straight line, no wind, and non-maneuvering flight profile, available fuel range would be about 523 nautical miles. These calculations do not account for fuel consumed during the start, taxi, and take off sequence. The pilot exceeded the fuel endurance, and the engine lost power. Also, the high-pitch attitude of the airplane observed by the witness could have resulted in the stall.

Probable cause: A total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion resulting from the pilot’s inadequate preflight planning. Contributing to the accident was that the pilot did not maintain an adequate airspeed, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall.

NTSB Identification: ERA11FA210

This March 2011 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Buford Suffridge says

    March 25, 2013 at 11:37 am

    “usable”, sorry about that extra “u”

  2. Buford Suffridge says

    March 25, 2013 at 11:36 am

    As for the fire, I don’t know anything about the tanks on a Piper Pacer, but would guess his “usuable” fuel was gone. My Cessna 182 holds 92 gallons but only 88 are usuable, leaving 4 gallons which would, Heaven forbid, be plenty to cause an explosion.

  3. Randy Coller says

    March 25, 2013 at 10:21 am

    1. I was on Naproxen for a while before hip replacement. No effects except for reducing pain. Did not affect mental capacity in any way.
    2. Pilots need to stop running out of fuel. Every pilot should adopt a personal minimum for fuel and adhere to it.
    3. If a pilot runs out of fuel in flight they should either voluntarily give up their certificate because they are too stupid to fly or have their certificates permanently revoked by the FAA.

  4. Jeff says

    March 25, 2013 at 8:20 am

    Naproxen is an anti inflammatory sold over the counter as in Alieve and used as a pain reliever particularly in those with sore joints. So what is the big deal? He ran out of fuel, wasn’t drugged up!

    • RudyH says

      March 25, 2013 at 9:45 am

      We just don’t know…post-mortems don’t have the pilots ‘mind events/condition recorded’ when there are mind-altering substances with known side effects involved. That’s why I bring this forward. Othere that I would hope the stuff is OK for the majority of aviators under the influence of it while in flight.

  5. John Drago says

    March 25, 2013 at 5:55 am

    No Gas? What caused the fire, the hot engine?

    • Lee Ensminger says

      March 25, 2013 at 9:03 am

      I, too, wondered about that. If the fuel was exhausted, how could it “explode in flames?” Did it crash into a car with a full gas tank? Hit a propane tank? The bottom line, though, is there was no way he was going to complete that flight on one tank of fuel!

  6. RudyH says

    March 24, 2013 at 9:29 pm

    Another pilot with Naproxen detected in the post-mortem…..see Mar 13th, C-150 student pilot blows it big time, also Naproxen in the post-mortem. Time for the AME’s to track this chemical for side effect trends…..

    • RudyH says

      March 24, 2013 at 9:31 pm

      My bad….make that Mar 11th….

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines