• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Love at first sight, before first flight

By Meg Godlewski · August 21, 2013 ·

Retiring often means down-sizing your life. You move out of the four-bedroom house into a two-bedroom condo because now that the kids are grown and gone, you no longer need all that room. Down-sizing also applies to airplane ownership.

Karen Smith of Bancroft, Ontario, Canada, who recently retired after 34 years in the aerial photography business, decided it was time to trade in the Cessna 180 that had been her photography platform for all those years for a more economical airplane. It was not an easy decision. “I thought selling the Cessna 180 would be like selling my own grandmother,” she said.

Owner copyHer first thought was to get a Cessna 140. Early in her career she flew a Cessna 140 from Ontario to Tuktoyaktuk, Canada, and then to Alaska, covering 10,000 miles and camping under the wing. Given that experience, the C-140 seemed the right choice.

“I never even considered a Light-Sport Aircraft as a replacement for the Cessna 180,” she added.

That changed in 2011 when she saw the tailwheel-equipped Aerotrek A220 at SUN ’n FUN.

She was instantly smitten. “I thought I had died and gone to heaven,” she said. “It reminded me a little of the Cessna 140. I bought it without even flying it!”

The Aerotrek A220 and the nosewheel version, the A240, are factory-built by Aeropro CZ in Europe. The Aerotrek website notes that Aeropro “has been producing aircraft since 1990 with over 370 aircraft now flying around the world.”

A key feature of the Aerotrek is the substantial visibility made possible by the abundant use of clear plexiglas in the windows and turtle-deck. For a pilot who wants to spend most of her time looking outside at nature, this airplane provides an excellent view.

Smith took delivery of her airplane in November 2012. She was pleasantly surprised to learn that the Aerotrek’s performance is “leaps and bounds above the 140. The Aerotrek cruises around 130 mph with my smaller tires and wheelpants on, and leaps into the air in 250-300 feet with little effort.

“The smooth controls and the feel of flying makes it seem as though you are ‘one’ with the airplane,” she continued. “That is far different than my experience with general aviation aircraft. I am absolutely bowled over with the aircraft, its payload, and its performance.”

DisplayAtSNF copyThe Aerotrek A220 sports a Rotax 912 ULS four-cylinder, four-stroke engine attached to a composite propeller. The airframe is 410 chromoly steel tubing. The wings are aluminum. The fuselage is covered with Poly Fiber.

The instrument panel can be customized by the buyer. The standard panel includes a legacy gauge airspeed indicator, altimeter, vertical speed, magnetic compass and slip/skid indicator. Engine instrumentation comes from a Grand Rapids Technologies EIS Model 4000 digital engine monitoring system, which provides for engine rpm, oil temperature, oil pressure, cylinder head temperature, four exhaust gas temperature gauges, outside air temperature, voltmeter, flight timer, a Rotax fuel pressure gauge, and low-fuel warning light.

Panel copyThe cockpit measures 44.1 inches across. The Cessna 140, by comparison, measures 34 inches across at the seat and 38 inches at shoulder level.

When not in flight, the Aerotrek’s wings can be folded back so the airplane takes up less space in a hangar. It can also be loaded on a trailer and towed.

Smith bought her Aerotrek from Rollison Light Sport Aircraft in Bloomfield, Indiana.

According to Rob Rollison, Smith’s enthusiasm for her new airplane is common among Aerotrek owners, who often share pictures of their airplanes on the company website.

In April, Smith joined the Aerotrek team at SUN ’n FUN, where her airplane was on display with wheel-skis. She is one of the first Aerotrek customers to acquire the wheel-skis.

The wheel-penetration skis are manufactured in Oregon by Summit Aircraft and sell for $4,200, according to Rollison. They can be installed on Aerotrek A220 taildraggers with no modifications required, he noted. “It is a quick, easy installation and they can be easily removed when the snow season is over,” he said.

Skies copySmith says the wheel-skis turn the airplane into an anytime, anywhere machine.

“Where I live, the runway seldom gets plowed and we have a lot of snow,” she said. “With the wheel-skis I can take off and fly to someplace with a paved runway and land and meet a friend for lunch.”

Although the Aerotrek doesn’t have the payload capability that the Cessna 180 had, Smith notes that in all her years of flying it, she rarely needed the space and weight hauling capability.

“I realize I don’t have the room of my Cessna 180, but in actual fact I rarely flew with more than one other person,” she said. “I do miss the room in the back seat, but all of the things I tried carrying, such as bicycles, weren’t always that practical. Carrying a tent and sleeping bags and clothes is fine in the Aerotrek.”

Here again the LSA tops the C-140, as the useful load of the Aerotrek A220 is 580 pounds. The useful load of the Cessna 140 is 560 pounds.

The operating costs of the Aerotrek are considerably lower than those of the Cessna 180. The average fuel burn for the Cessna 180 was in the neighborhood of 14 gallons per hour in cruise flight. The Aerotrek burns closer to five gallons per hour. That means more flights for less money, said Smith, who joked that the lower cost is reflected in the Aerotrek’s tailnumber.

“It is VLE, which I say stands for Very Little Expense,” Smith laughed.“I grin like a Cheshire Cat every time I fly it.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Albert Beckwith says

    August 22, 2013 at 7:59 am

    Karen:
    At 85 and fortunately I continue to have a class 3 FAA Medical. The required medical tells me how my systems is operating since I do a Stress test etc every 6 months.
    Also I enjoy my work as a Flight School Owner and also Aerial Photos.
    Karen: You made the right choice to continue quality longevity doing what you Love.

  2. Gary Gaudreau says

    August 22, 2013 at 5:43 am

    Great article on our own Karen Smith. Karen has been an active member of the Bancroft Flying Club (www.bancroftflyingclub.ca) for decades and instrumental in keeping our little club alive and well. She is finishing construction of a new hangar for her Aerotrek, and like everything Karen does – it’s first class.

    Gary Gaudreau, Secretary, Bancroft Flying Club

  3. Dave Hill says

    August 21, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    Awesome story. Thank you for sharing. I’m doing training in a Tecnam p92 Eaglet – S-LSA aircraft. I love it. It is the most fun I’ve ever had flying.

  4. Gerald Althouse says

    August 21, 2013 at 6:21 pm

    Forgot to mention that the rubber parts are to be replaced every FIVE YEARS.

  5. Steve says

    August 21, 2013 at 6:16 pm

    Should’ve bought the C-140, for a fraction of the cost …

    • Rod Beck says

      August 21, 2013 at 7:42 pm

      NOT LSA, Steve – a, the whole LSA movement has been “under sold” since its inception In 2004! Nice article, Meg!

  6. Gerald Althouse says

    August 21, 2013 at 5:54 pm

    There are a lot more expenses that 5 GPH fuel burn. Unless things have changed, all, I mean all the rubber parts under the cowling should be replaced, as per Rotax. The coolant, oil and fuel hose replacement is not cheap. Then there is the fuel pump, carb altitude compensating diaphragms and rubber mounts. The carbs need to be balanced periodically. The gearbox needs periodic inspection if it has a slip clutch installed. Those Rotax 912’s are beautiful performing engines but are fairly “high maintenance”, if you know what I mean. I discovered these things AFTER I purchased one. Hope Karen knew before purchasing.

    • Rod Beck says

      August 22, 2013 at 8:57 am

      Jerry; Best of BOTH worlds; purchase a “used” bird (if available) for say $75-85K range, near same reliability at a substantial (capital) cost saving- “NEW” becomes used very quickly!

    • Dave Hill says

      August 22, 2013 at 4:05 pm

      Gee, new Rotax about $8,500. New 100 HP Continental about $18,500. $10k buys a lot of maintenance.

      • Rod Beck says

        August 23, 2013 at 5:25 pm

        Dave; Except to many self appointed “X-perts” didn’t think of that!

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines