• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fast approach, bad landing

By NTSB · October 11, 2013 ·

Aircraft: Cessna Cardinal. Injuries: None. Location: Honesdale, Penn. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The pilot had the airplane configured for landing with 30° of flaps. The asphalt runway measured 2,420 foot.

Normal airspeed for landing is 70 mph, but the Cardinal was indicating 85 to 90 mph.

After touchdown, the pilot realized there was insufficient runway remaining to bring the airplane to a stop. He added power and raised the flaps for a go-around, but the plane did not have enough altitude to clear trees at the end of the runway.

Probable cause: The pilot’s excessive airspeed during final approach and his delayed decision to abort the landing, resulting in an in-flight collision with trees during the go-around.

NTSB Identification: ERA12CA020

This October 2011 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Steve R says

    October 11, 2013 at 7:53 pm

    No matter what he is used to, this amount of excessive speed is unacceptable. If you are not consistantly using the recommended approach speeds and planning touchdowns at the same point (read as near the numbers on most runways regardless of length) every time, you are setting yourself up for things like this pilot experienced. Cardinals are easily landed at airports of the length he was using if proper technique is used.

  2. Rod Beck says

    October 11, 2013 at 7:32 pm

    The decision point (altitude/airspeed) or “in the slot” for a short (relatively) for a low time pilot or one not accustomed to runways of this length, should be at LEAST a 1/2 mile final. and no “closer in”.
    Simply, if the appropriate “numbers” (altitude/airspeed) 65 knts/70 mph, have NOT been attained, a GO-AROUND should be executed. I would bet “dollars to donuts” this aviator was accustomed to airports or his home base with runway lengths exceeding 4,000ft+!

  3. Andy says

    October 11, 2013 at 9:19 am

    Gee, I bet if that guy had not been required to get a medical certificate, those trees would not have been there!

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines