• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Poor fuel management results in ditching

By NTSB · December 16, 2013 ·

Aircraft: Waco YMF5. Injuries: None. Location: Marathon, Fla. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: According to the pilot, at the beginning of the day the main fuel tanks of the airplane were 7/8ths full. The pilot spent the day conducting sightseeing flights departing from an island airport.

The accident happened on the third flight of the day. The airplane was about two nautical miles from the airport when, following a left turn climbing maneuver, the engine began to surge. The pilot elected to perform a ditching in the ocean.

Despite the fact that the engine stopped surging and began producing “almost takeoff power” when the airplane was about 500 feet above the water, the pilot opted to continue with the ditching. Upon impact with the water, the airplane nosed over.

After the airplane was recovered from the water, about four gallons of fuel and 16 gallons of sea water were drained from the 36-gallon capacity left fuel tank. The right 36-gallon fuel tank was empty. Neither fuel tank had been breached.

During the post-accident examination of the airframe and engine, no pre-accident mechanical malfunctions or failures were found that would have precluded normal engine operation.

Investigators determined that given the low fuel quantity, it is likely that, during the left turn climbing maneuver, the fuel tank inlet was unported, and air was introduced into the system, which caused the engine surge. Once the climbing turn was stopped, normal fuel flow began and engine operation resumed.

It was noted that the wires attached to the cork floats of each of the two fuel quantity sight gauges were bent and that this was causing the gauges to register a fuel quantity of 7/8ths, irrespective of the actual fuel quantity. It could not be determined if the wires were bent before the accident or as a result of the impact.

If the wires were bent before the accident, then the pilot should have recognized that the indicated fuel quantity was not changing during the first and second flights of the day and should have taken further action to verify the actual fuel quantity aboard the airplane before initiating the accident flight.

If the wires were bent as a result of the impact, then the fuel gauges would have been working properly, and the pilot should have noted the low fuel quantity and refueled the airplane before initiating the accident flight.

Probable cause: The pilot did not ensure that there was sufficient fuel aboard the airplane before initiating the flight, which resulted in temporary fuel starvation and an interruption in engine power during maneuvering. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s decision to continue with the ditching after engine power was restored.

NTSB Identification: ERA12LA126

This December 2011 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

 

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Paul Goodwin says

    December 24, 2013 at 2:35 am

    2 years have past since a moonlighting homeland security pilot crashed that beautiful Waco n64je. Not mentioned in the ntsb report was that the pilot was texting 10 minutes before swimming lessons. He saved his federal fire arm which he was carrying before the passengers were out of the water. (Open cock pit airplanes make everyone feel like the red Barron) . His statements as to flight times and routes were in conflict with written witness statements as well as performing aerobatic maneuvers without parachutes. This pilot even shows up at FAA invistigation in his federal uniform with exposed gun. The FAA inspector in charge even pointed his finger in my face and said ” we better not see you again”, I was fishing! Anyway a book will follow that will entertain after 11 years of commercial tourist rides some endearing as well as astonishing occurances.

  2. Bluestar says

    December 17, 2013 at 9:36 am

    You’ve got an excellent fuel gauge, lack of attention to the gauge functioning brought the aircraft down.
    Fuel and airspeed, without them, you’re going down

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines