• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Power-loss landing results in off pavement landing

By NTSB · January 29, 2014 ·

Aircraft: Piper Cherokee. Injuries: None. Location: Chehalis, Wash. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The accident happened during a flight review. While performing a simulated engine-out forced landing at a non-controlled airport the pilot did not manage the glide profile in a manner that allowed him to glide all the way to the approach end of the runway.

The airplane touched down in a grassy area about 300 feet short of the runway threshold. At the point of touchdown, the airplane’s stabilator hit a piece of rebar that had been placed in the ground to mark the location of a future airport lighting system component. The rebar was outside of the boundary of the runway safety area.

The CFI who was giving the flight review stated that he did not suggest to the pilot that he add power, because it appeared to him that the grassy area was clear.

Probable cause: The pilot’s inability to correctly manage his glide profile during a simulated engine-out forced landing.

NTSB Identification: WPR12LA087

This January 2012 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Misanthrope says

    January 30, 2014 at 1:26 pm

    Too funny!

  2. Ray says

    January 30, 2014 at 9:07 am

    This is called learning the hard way. All too often some peoples SOP.

  3. Bart says

    January 30, 2014 at 7:05 am

    I have two questions. Did the pilot pass the BFR? ( He wouldn’t have for me since he didn’t add power on his own. He’s a licensed pilot, not a student, and the function of the BFR is demonstrate competence.) Is the CFI still a CFI? (He should at the very least have had to do a recertification ride. This was a dumb thing to do!)

    • Dan says

      February 15, 2014 at 7:31 am

      What do you mean pass. You telling me that if a cfi didn’t like how you do your walk around or anything else that he pulls your cert. I don’t think so.

      • Ray says

        February 17, 2014 at 12:03 pm

        You don’t pass or fail a BFR. Your skills are evaluated by a CFI and then he logs the flight and suggests ways to improve.

  4. Mike says

    January 30, 2014 at 6:09 am

    Okay, so the pilot goofed… BUT shame, shame, shame on this CFI for letting this happen.

  5. Sarah A says

    January 30, 2014 at 5:52 am

    Is it just me or does the CFI sound a bit reckless for taking a practice forced landing all the way to the ground for an off runway landing ? It might be inside the airport fence but unless it is an area that is routinely used by aircraft who knows what dangers might be present, maybe a small sink hole for the gear to drop into and catch or a nearly invisible piece or rebar ? It might have reenforced the lesson to take it all the way but airplanes are expensive and training potentially dangerous so why go past the point where the pilots capabilities were reviewed. If you are not a glider pilot already I would think the lesson is over when the pilot demonstrates the proper handling of the situation and uses good judgement in selecting a landing site and direction. There is always the possibility that you may not get power back when you want it and that has happened more then once so why press on to low altitude and the risk that comes with it ?

    Just my opinion…

    • Bluestar says

      January 30, 2014 at 2:02 pm

      Exactly.!!!
      Common sense, something the CFI is missing, and you can’t train for it.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines