• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Video: NBAA talks RPA

By Ben Sclair · October 22, 2014 ·

“The FAA is expected to issue its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) [which we name remotely piloted aircraft (RPA)] by the end of 2014. In a standing-room-only session at NBAA2014, a panel discussion covered many questions: Will UAS operators be required to be certificated pilots? Will the UAS itself have to be certificated? Is the U.S. falling behind the international community in its regulation and use of UAS? This video gives a brief overview of the session.”

 

About Ben Sclair

Ben Sclair is the Publisher of General Aviation News, a pilot, husband to Deb and dad to Zenith, Brenna, and Jack. Oh, and a staunch supporter of general aviation.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Tom says

    October 23, 2014 at 6:19 am

    How do the drones get away with violating minimum safe altitudes prescribed for general aviation aircraft under 91.119 – ie no closer than 1000 feet over congested areas or 500 feet in other than congested areas? I don’t want them flying over my house below 500 feet and I don’t want them in my airspace above that without “see and avoid (other aircraft)” capability. So it seems to follow then that they need to be treated as regular airplanes and all of the requirements applicable to regular airplanes and “pilots” would have to apply in the interest of consistency. Go figure.

  2. Eliacim Cortes says

    October 22, 2014 at 8:13 pm

    Everybody wants drones because they are supposedly cheaper to operate than real (manned) aircraft. The truth is that, if drones are to share airspace with real aircraft, they can’t be cheaper to operate than real aircraft. This is so because drones and their operators would have to meet the same certification and operation requirements as real aircraft. Real aircraft and pilots have to meet strict FAA standards, namely to assure safe operation. Requiring anything less from the drones, therefore, would compromise safety, and would be totally unacceptable. Having drones meet all necessary certification and safety standards will negate their cost savings. To operate a drone, you would need an FAA certified operator (I am not calling them pilots) with current medical and bi annual review, a commercial license, maintenance performed by an A&P, and an annual inspection performed by an IA, ADS-B out, etc. etc. So, where is the cost saving? Or, don’t tell me that the FAA pretends that we share the airspace with drones that don’t meet the same safety and certification standards as our aircraft??? Can’t have it both ways. The safety and certification standards are either necessary or they are not…

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines