• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Poor planning leads to off-airport landing

By NTSB · November 3, 2014 ·

Aircraft: Piper Super Cub. Injuries: 1 Minor. Location: Akiachak, Alaska. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The private pilot departed on a flight between two remote Alaskan communities. Because of deteriorating weather conditions along the flight route, he decided to return to his home airport.

During the return flight, he became concerned about his remaining fuel and diverted to an alternate airport. When he reached that airport, he elected not to land because he believed that he had enough fuel to reach his home airport.

As the flight continued, the engine lost power, but he was able to switch fuel tanks and restart the engine.

While maneuvering to land at the closest airport, all engine power was lost, and the pilot made an off-airport landing in a snow-and tree-covered area.

During the approach, the airplane stalled and collided with terrain.

The pilot also reported that while en route to the alternate airport, the instrument panel-mounted carbon monoxide detector turned black.

According to the carbon monoxide detector manufacturer, a positive indication for carbon monoxide would be indicated by the detector showing yellow, green, or dark blue color. Any other color would indicate that the detector was contaminated or outdated. No expiration date was recorded on the carbon monoxide detector.

A post-accident examination of the airplane’s muffler and cabin heater did not disclose any leaks or mechanical anomalies. Therefore, it is unlikely that there was a problem with carbon monoxide during the flight.

Probable cause: The pilot’s inadequate fuel planning, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion, and the pilot’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the subsequent forced landing, which resulted in an inadvertent stall.

NTSB Identification: ANC13LA009

This November 2012 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. RRaty says

    November 4, 2014 at 9:53 am

    From this, I get: Once you commit to an action, stick with it. Don’t change your mind unless you have a serious change of data. His mistake was deciding to not land at the alternate after all. I get that not all bush strips have fuel easily available (or none at all) and it may have been a cold night, but…….

  2. Tom says

    November 4, 2014 at 9:35 am

    “….which resulted in an inadvertent stall.”

    These NTSB reports never cease to amaze me. No, it wasn’t an “inadvertent” stall. The pilot stalled the aircraft on purpose during the forced landing. Nothing “inadvertent” about it.

  3. Ray says

    November 3, 2014 at 9:54 am

    Can you feel the collective cringe of all the Bush Pilots out there?

    • Tom says

      November 4, 2014 at 11:49 am

      “….Bush Pilots”.

      Don’t you mean “bush pilots”? Or did you mean H.W. Bush or George Bush pilots of Air Force 1? (couldn’t resist myself).

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines