• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Solo cross country ends badly

By NTSB · November 25, 2014 ·

Aircraft: Cessna 150. Injuries: None. Location: Red Oak, Iowa. Aircraft damage: Substantial.

What reportedly happened: The student pilot was on the third leg of a VFR solo cross-country flight. He was on approach to an airport where he planned to do a touch and go, then return to his initial departure airport.

During his first and second approaches for the touch and go he executed go-arounds due to what he described as turbulence when the airplane came into ground effect.

During the third approach, the airplane touched down to the left of centerline and began to skid to the left.

The student pilot stated that he applied the wrong rudder correction and the airplane went off the runway.

He added power and tried to abort the landing but the airplane stalled and came down hard on the left wing, then came to rest in a bean field adjacent to the runway.

The student pilot had a total of 25 flight hours in the airplane, with 4.2 hours as pilot-in-command (solo). The wind was calm at the time of the accident.

Probable cause: The loss of control while landing due to the student pilot’s delay to execute a go-around and his improper control inputs during a bounced landing.

NTSB Identification: CEN13CA087

This November 2012 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. TomC says

    November 26, 2014 at 3:14 pm

    I was the first official passenger of a close friend who recently qualified for his PPL. On the first approach to landing he was high and hot. He flared a good 15-20 ft. agl. Correction, he didn’t flare so much as he yanked the yoke back and the plane began an insidious porpoising until we eventually “flopped” onto the runway. “Crap”, he said, “that wasn’t one of my best”. He pushed the throttle forward and we were off for another go.
    On the second attempt to land I could see the same scenario developing; clearly he was afraid the earth would reach up and smite us. When he yanked the yoke back again, I suggest he add some power to arrest the decent and fly the plane onto the runway. He did with great success, though he used up half of it.
    He now has over 200 hours and he still approaches high and hot. He wants to start IFR training and I’m hoping that will get him to fly a better precision approach.
    I’m surprised he was cleared for the test, and more surprised he passed with such sloppy landing skills.
    But, what do I know….

  2. Doug says

    November 26, 2014 at 12:34 pm

    Tom’s question is well taken. If the student pilot was on his solo long cross-country required flight, he was supposed to make full stop landings at each of the three airports; that was the protocol for the Private Pilot Certificate many years ago when I learned to fly. Cutting corners, literally, is not good judgement nor good airmanship.

  3. Tom says

    November 26, 2014 at 8:15 am

    Really amazing. Pilot said “turbulence” but the facts showed that the wind was “calm” at the airport. Aircraft drifted but pilot said that the wrong rudder was used when it’s the “stick” that keeps the airplane from drifting not the rudders. How could this guy have been released for solo with no knowledge of the correct use of the controls and inability to handle a no wind condition?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines