• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Advocacy groups oppose restrictions on business at HTO

By General Aviation News Staff · March 12, 2015 ·

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) joined by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association and the National Business Aviation Association submitted comments at the March 12 East Hampton Town Board Meeting in opposition to the town’s proposal to restrict operations at East Hampton Airport (HTO) in New York.

The town is proposing four restrictions on the use of the East Hampton Airport effective May 1 to Oct. 31,  with the proposal’s impact being reassessed after Oct. 31:

  • A mandatory nighttime curfew, from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m.;
  • An extended curfew on noisy aircraft, from 8 p.m. to 9 a.m.;
  • A ban on all helicopters on weekends during the summer season; and
  • A limit on operations by noisy aircraft of one trip (one arrival and one departure) per week during the summer season.

East Hampton AirportRecently, NATA hosted a meeting with town officials from East Hampton and the other aviation groups to discuss the proposal’s impacts on the general aviation community, local businesses and the national air transportation system.

“The imposition of the proposed restrictions and investment plan on HTO-based aviation businesses, including full service fuel providers, flight school services as well as charter services, will have a negative impact. Though town officials have committed to reassessing the proposed restrictions in November, we fear the resultant damage in lost revenue, investment opportunities and jobs will be irreparable. Aviation jobs are good-paying jobs that will not be easily replaced in the community,” stated NATA Senior Vice President for Government and External Affairs Bill Deere.

In their comments, the aviation groups also emphasized that the proposals before the town board raise significant legal questions.

“Simply put, East Hampton Airport is part of a national system of airports, and operational restrictions like those under consideration present a threat to the national air transportation system that transcends local communities. This is the primary reason why the FAA requires airports that have received federal funds to adhere to grant assurances requiring, among other things, access to all airports on reasonable conditions and without unjust discrimination. This is a critical element in the survival of our nation’s system of airports and one the town can expect will be vigorously defended.”

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Brent says

    March 12, 2015 at 9:13 pm

    Alas, flying under such restrictions takes the joy and business use of aircraft….right out of the sky AND local airports. Guess that retires my profession….thanks a lot…..

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines