• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Poor approach creases Cirrus

By NTSB · April 20, 2015 ·

A flight instructor and student were practicing short field landings in a Cirrus SR22 at the airport in Milledgville, Ga. When the airplane was about 20 feet above the ground and on final approach, the airspeed suddenly decreased.

The student pilot applied full engine power. The airplane yawed to the left, then hit the ground short of the runway.

The flight instructor took the flight controls, decreased the engine power to idle, and applied the brakes. The Cirrus hit a taxiway sign, resulting in substantial damage before coming to a stop.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the student pilot’s failure to maintain a proper approach path for landing and the flight instructor’s delayed remedial action, which resulted in a runway undershoot and collision with a taxiway sign.

NTSB Identification: ERA13CA222

This April 2013 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Warren says

    April 22, 2015 at 7:26 am

    I have similar total hours to John and 338 hours in Cirrus aircraft, two thirds of that in the SR22. I’ve done all of the maneuvers in both required for pilot certification, plus have taken both on some pretty long trips. I think the flying characteristics are very good in all phases, and the cabins are the most comfortable I have experienced. The Cirrus’ have been the best selling aircraft for quite a few years – that speaks for itself.

  2. John Wesley says

    April 20, 2015 at 1:49 pm

    NTSB forgot to add, The airplane is a twitchy, poor flying POC, with extremely poor low speed handling characteristics.

    • matt says

      April 21, 2015 at 5:21 am

      John,

      I’m curious as to why you would make such a statement. You were not there and for you to call an airplane a POC tells us that perhaps you are not as wise as you claim to be as an aviator. Please keep your poor comments to yourself and don’t make the rest of us wonder why a fellow pilot (I assume you are one of some sort) would post a comment like this.

      • John Wesley says

        April 21, 2015 at 6:48 pm

        I make these comments because they are true, after 50 years in aviation, as of this September 13th, over 15 thousand accident and incident free hours, with experience in 126 different aircraft, including the Cirrus, I standby my statements, The Cirrus line are twitchy, not fun to fly, high priced POC, with altogether too many shortcomings. Just because I refuse to drink the Kool-Aid, that is no reason to call into question my wisdom.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines