• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Poor planning leads to off airport landing

By NTSB · May 25, 2015 ·

The owner of the Cessna 182 and a flight instructor departed on a 90-minute flight, which included multiple practice takeoffs and landings at three different airports.

The flight instructor had about 5,300 hours, which included more than 500 hours in C-182s.The private pilot reported about 230 hours, including about 90 hours in C-182s.

When the airplane was at an altitude of about 2,000 feet MSL, it experienced a loss of engine power.

The flight instructor assumed control of the airplane and noted that the right fuel tank gauge indicated “empty” and that the left fuel tank gauge indicated about a quarter of a tank. The CFI’s attempts to restore power were unsuccessful and the CFI made a forced landing in a grass field in Clewiston, Fla.

Neither the CFI or pilot/owner were injured.

Both fuel tanks were found intact. The right fuel tank was empty, and the left fuel tank contained about seven gallons of uncontaminated fuel, which was only two gallons more than the reported usable fuel.

The flight instructor stated that the engine continued to operate at low power during the forced landing, however, investigators noted the lack of rotational damage on the propeller assembly was consistent with a total loss of engine power.

Investigators determined that, although the reported temperature and dew point about the time of the accident were conducive to the accumulation of carburetor icing at cruise power, given the low fuel state at the time of the power loss, it was more likely that the engine lost power due to fuel starvation.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the private pilot’s inadequate preflight planning and fuel management and the flight instructor’s inadequate supervision, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.

NTSB Identification: ERA13LA239

This May 2013 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bluestar says

    May 26, 2015 at 1:22 pm

    There is no excuse for this incident, knowing how much go juice is a prerequisite to any flight. Its all part of the planning process, something I think these pilots ignored.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines