• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

States pass own laws governing drones

By General Aviation News Staff · September 7, 2015 ·

Without federal rules governing remotely piloted aircraft — also known as drones and unmanned aerial systems — states are blazing their own (potentially conflicting) paths, according to a report in the National Journal. Three years after it was tasked with de­vel­op­ing a set of rules for com­mer­cial drone op­er­at­ors, the FAA still has not fi­nal­ized the reg­u­la­tions, in­stead dol­ing out more than 1,000 ex­emp­tions to al­low busi­nesses to fly drones. Tired of waiting on Washington, 26 states have developed their own rules, ranging from “mildly limiting to ex­tremely re­strict­ive,” according to the report.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Jeff Aryan says

    September 8, 2015 at 8:39 am

    Yes, I agree States and local gov’ts should produce their own laws and rules regarding drones and UAS systems. Why, because they are ones being effected and they FAA is so far behind in what works and what doesn’t it is no wonder why local gov’ts are doing the people’s work. At the local level the laws can be changed modified with greater speed and accuracy the FAA.

    As for the Administrator, I think he should resign. Yes, all he does is give speeches full of hot air and nothing of substance. His integrity in my opinion is questionable because he “totes” the company line by being none committal and probably takes his marching orders from the political whiz kids (aka, Hacks) from the administration who only care about politics and nothing more.

    Mr. Administrator, you accepted the job. Now do the job correctly. Take the correct stand by taking a stand. That is what you are getting paid to do. You are working for the whole people of the United States not the few that put you in office. That is what leadership is all about. Do the right thing.

  2. Many years flying says

    September 8, 2015 at 8:02 am

    EXCUSES! EXCUSES! EXCUSES!

    At every turn, the FAA is showing itself as a paralyzed bureaucratic Agency. At a time when total flying hours are down, the number of active pilots is likewise dropping precipitously and yet the FAA budget is growing, they STILL can’t seem to get the job done. The Administrator is only good at one thing: giving speeches filled with hot air and smoke and mirrors while simultaneously patting himself on the back. The Agency ought to be apolitical and yet — sadly — it is not.

    It’s time for a new Administrator who knows how to accomplish things AND has a background in aviation, not Olympic games. The ‘buck’ stops with him. And, while we’re at it, they need to lay off more than half of their legal staff … THEY are part of the problem, as well. The FAA is an Agency which ‘eating’ it’s own constituency.

  3. Stephen Mann says

    September 7, 2015 at 2:12 pm

    “Three years after it was tasked with de­vel­op­ing a set of rules for com­mer­cial drone op­er­at­ors, the FAA still has not fi­nal­ized the reg­u­la­tions, in­stead dol­ing out more than 1,000 ex­emp­tions to al­low busi­nesses to fly drones. ”

    If you believe that the FAA is slow to finalizing rules for UAS integration into the NAS, then you simply do not understand the NPRM process and the enormous task the FAA has to coordinate all of the pieces involved. Three years from NPRM to Final Rules would be bureaucratic light-speed. The Part 103 rules for ultralights took 8 years. And how long have we been waiting for third-class reform?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines