• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Failure to retract landing gear before water landing injures two

By NTSB · January 21, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that following an uneventful takeoff in the amphibious float equipped Maule M7-235, he intended on performing a water landing at a nearby lake as part of his checkride.

During the water landing near Lake Havasu, Arizona, the airplane immediately nosed over, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and wings, as well as two minor injuries.

The pilot stated he had become distracted after takeoff and did not retract the landing gear for the water landing.

The designated pilot examiner onboard the airplane reported that he did not confirm the position of the landing gear prior to the water landing.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilots’ failure to verify the landing gear position prior to the water landing and the pilot/examiner’s failure to adequately monitor the pilot.

NTSB Identification: WPR14CA093

This January 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Old Dusterpilot says

    January 23, 2016 at 8:44 pm

    Many thanks for the guys asking all you ‘newbies’ with all your acronyms to be a little more clear. Us ‘old Rusty Pilots’ are having enough trouble with all the regulations put in place (most are really necessary), much less trying to decipher the thousands of acronyms.

  2. Bill Ross says

    January 23, 2016 at 6:14 am

    BJS needs a tab bit or work on his English or lack thereof.

    • BJS says

      January 23, 2016 at 6:16 am

      Can’t recognize a joke, huh?

    • BJS says

      January 23, 2016 at 6:44 am

      A tab?

  3. C J says

    January 22, 2016 at 9:29 am

    I have seen the results of Cessna’s and SeaBee’s doing the same thing. It gets really expensive, too.

  4. Bruce Hinds, past president Washington Seaplane Pilots says

    January 22, 2016 at 8:14 am

    You have to wonder what the Pilot Examiner was “examining” during this check ride if he never noticed the pilot didn’t retract the wheels after take off.

    • Randy Woods says

      January 22, 2016 at 8:37 am

      I was thinking the same thing.

    • John says

      January 22, 2016 at 8:43 am

      It appears the pilot examiner AND the candidate both failed to follow checklists. It happens.

      A few years ago an acquaintance was taking a ME checkride in a company Seneca. During the check ride the examiner quietly pulled a gear CB then got a conversation going with the candidate. It was night, so maybe that was a little bit of a factor, maybe both were fatigued after a full day of work and etc… Anyhow, the candidate succumbed to distraction, and the examiner forgot the pulled CB (that is, until he heard ‘ching ching’ from both sides of the aircraft as the aircraft settled onto its belly…).

      The ME candidate didn’t get his endorsement, and I expect (but don’t know) the DE got another checkride of his own. Other than that, two engine tear downs, two new props, and some new belly skin there were no injuries to other than pride, credentials, and insurance premiums.

      • BJS says

        January 22, 2016 at 9:49 am

        WAT the H is a ME, CB and DE. SPK in plain ENG for THOS of us IGNORS who aren’t as BRT as J.

        • Randy Woods says

          January 22, 2016 at 11:56 am

          ME= Multi Engine
          CB= Circuit Breaker
          DE= Designated Examiner

          • BJS says

            January 22, 2016 at 12:27 pm

            TNK U

    • Comanche-Indian says

      January 23, 2016 at 9:37 am

      Maybe they were examining the bikini babes on the boats on Lake Havasu?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines