• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Plane lands on roof of building after encountering downdraft

By NTSB · March 18, 2016 ·

The owner of the recently-purchased, 65-hp Kitfox II was undergoing tailwheel endorsement training. He and the flight instructor had previously flown the plane about nine hours, for about two hours each time, with no problems noted.

They had begun the flight about an hour earlier; the wind was from the west, and they were landing and taking off on the single runway toward the north at the airport in Vicksburg, Miss.After a touch-and-go landing, when the plane was 300 to 400 above the ground in a full-power, climbing right turn, it stopped climbing.

The pilots checked that the power was at maximum, and the flight instructor took control. He continued the turn to the south, but the airplane continued to lose altitude.

The CFI thought about landing on a parallel road, but because there were cars present, he landed the plane, still at full power, on the roof of an industrial supply building, resulting in two serious injuries.

The pilot/owner thought the descent could have resulted from windshear or a swirl, as the airplane had “good forward motion” during the entire descent.

The CFI stated that, at the time of the accident, the airplane was 50 pounds under its 950-pound maximum gross weight.

Subsequent examination of the wreckage indicated evidence of high power at impact and did not reveal any preexisting mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.

The wind, recorded at the airport about five minutes before the accident, was from the southwest at 12 knots. About 15 minutes after the accident, the wind was from the southwest, but variable from the south and west at 8 knots; and about 35 minutes after the accident, the wind was from the southwest at 9 knots, gusting to 15 knots.

A review of atmospheric conditions at the time revealed an unstable but dry atmosphere that may have resulted in downdrafts.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the airplane’s low-level encounter with a downdraft that maximum engine power could not overcome.

NTSB Identification: ERA14LA164

This March 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Richard says

    March 21, 2016 at 6:10 am

    Downwind turn in a low power aircraft equals recipe for a disaster. Glad they survived.

  2. Andy says

    March 19, 2016 at 7:43 am

    *had

  3. Andy says

    March 19, 2016 at 7:42 am

    No, they still have one option open to them: the roof!

  4. Paul J says

    March 18, 2016 at 8:25 am

    I am glad they were OK. I wonder how I could have handle this? I always try to put mu self in situations
    like this. Landing on a roof looks like they ran out od options.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines