• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Seaplane pilot misjudges altitude over glassy lake

By NTSB · April 15, 2016 ·

The pilot of the float-equipped Cessna 206 reported that he intended to practice water landings and operations after about seven months of seaplane inactivity due to winter.

He was flying above a lake in Gilford, N.H., with glassy water conditions surveying the surface for ice or other hazards when the airplane’s floats inadvertently contacted the water “a bit harder” then normal.

The pilot elected to reduce engine power and attempted to land, however, the plane nosed over into the water, and subsequently sank.

During a post-accident examination, the right float displayed evidence of contact with the propeller and the aft portion of the fuselage, near the empennage, was substantially damaged.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot misjudged the float-equipped airplane’s altitude while maneuvering above the surface of a lake, which resulted in a float inadvertently contacting the water. Contributing to the accident were the glassy water conditions and pilot’s lack of recent experience in amphibious airplanes.

NTSB Identification: ERA14CA209

This April 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. C J says

    April 18, 2016 at 8:58 am

    Glassy surface landings or even dragging the surface requires some good judgment that could be inadequate after a long time away from being current, too. Float planes set higher up and they are all different. Maybe the pilot should have had an observer with them.

  2. Phil says

    April 15, 2016 at 10:23 am

    Car bumpers have proximity sensors these days. Maybe someone should create a similar device for the pontoons of floatplanes so the pilot has an objective measure of how far above the water the float is.

    • Lee Ensminger says

      April 18, 2016 at 5:26 am

      Great idea! And along those same lines, why wouldn’t that work if mounted to a main landing wheel? Perhaps a tone or beep that increased speed until it was a solid tone just before touchdown?

    • jay says

      April 18, 2016 at 5:29 am

      That sounds unnecessarily expensive to an already expensive aircraft. You must remember the cost to get something PMA or TSO approved. In float plane flying if you are landing on a glassy surface the suggestion is to look horizontally at the trees or buildings on the shoreline to judge your distance above the water. Most accidents in float plane flying usually occur when people with amphibian floats landing on the water with the gear down. Are there warning systems in place to warn the pilot? Yes, but typically they pull the circuit breaker as they find the annunciator for the system annoying.

      • C J says

        April 18, 2016 at 9:01 am

        Yes, the cost of an STC and then PMA or TSO can get prohibitively expensive. But, maybe a portable system not permanently installed would be a better way.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines