• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Broken alternator contributes to crash

By NTSB · May 4, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that the flight departed about two hours after sunset and that, several minutes after departure, the Piper PA-28-235’s lights began to dim.

He reduced the electrical load. however, within several minutes, the airplane lost all electrical power.

He chose to continue to the destination airport, which was 21 nm from the departure airport and was within sight.

Upon reaching the airport in Brooksville, Florida, the pilot used the runway end identifier lights and the runway’s visual approach slope indicator lights to guide the plane to the runway threshold.

Due to the lack of electrical power, he was unable to use the airplane’s radio to activate the other available runway lighting or use the landing lights to help him further locate the runway after crossing the threshold.

He misjudged the airplane’s height above the runway, and, during the landing flare from an estimated height of about 4 or 5 feet, the airplane hit the runway. It then veered right, left the runway, hit an airport sign, and was substantially damaged.

A post-accident examination revealed that the alternator had failed, which likely led to the airplane’s total loss of electrical power.

Review of the airplane’s maintenance logs found that no maintenance related to the alternator had been documented in the airplane’s 50-year and 2,600-flight-hour history.

A survey of airports near the airplane’s route of flight showed no continuously lighted airports located within a reasonable distance of the airplane’s route.

The NTSB determines the probable cause as the pilot’s loss of directional control while landing at night, which resulted in a runway excursion and collision with airport signage. Contributing to the accident was the total loss of electrical power, which necessitated the pilot having to land without the aid of the airplane’s landing lights and some of the available runway lighting.

NTSB Identification: ERA14LA244

This May 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Rich says

    May 5, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    Would someone explain how a pilot lands a seaplane at night??
    HMMMM.
    This was avoidable.
    Apparently he was never taught.

    My CFI flew PBY Catalinas during WWll.
    I was very lucky to have him.

  2. Joe Gutierrez says

    May 5, 2016 at 1:42 pm

    Ha,Hahahahahahahahahaha, this clown dosen’t deserve any more than a stupid laugh for a stupid decision, and for not maintaining his aircraft. Not even giving a thought to the age of the alternator, ( 50 years ) come on, this act deserves the donkey award for the year…

    • Jamie Mann says

      May 5, 2016 at 3:19 pm

      Well said Joe.

    • Rich says

      May 5, 2016 at 9:35 pm

      Does it say how long the pilot owned this airplane?

      As far as we know he could have bought it last month.

      And it could have been sold with a “Fresh Annual”.
      Like so many of them are.

      I hope you are as forgiving on yourself in the future.

  3. John says

    May 5, 2016 at 8:58 am

    Landing on a black runway is a tough maneuver. 20-20 hindsight is even tougher. FWIW, at least one well known aviation maintenance lecturer advocates “fix on failure” for non critical parts. The problem, of course, is what is a “non critical” part? For day VFR neither battery or alternator are necessary by regulation or good practice. The pilot may or may not have strss tested his battery to assure it would carry a full charge. He may also have omitted the load meter or whatever from his scan. Would the outstanding pilots who have never, EVER changed an alternator solely based on time in service, nor missed the discharge indication in their scan please raise the right hand and accept our admiring ooohs! and aaahhhs?

  4. JimH. says

    May 5, 2016 at 6:54 am

    Wow.!! A lot of stupid pilot tricks on this one.!
    – poor maintenance. At 2600 hrs, the alternator field brushes are worn. so, for a $5 set of brushes the pilot wrecks the aircraft.
    – after 2 minutes the lights dim.! Why not return to the departure airport and land with the remaining battery power….and it sounds like an un-airworthy, old battery.
    – with a 7000 ft runway, why not just let the aircraft settle-on gently ?
    – this guy is an A&P.? I wouldn’t let him touch my aircraft.!
    – for night flights, why not carry a handheld radio ?

  5. Dennis Adams says

    May 5, 2016 at 6:19 am

    A hand held radio costs about $250, cheap insurance especially for night flying.

  6. Art says

    May 5, 2016 at 5:55 am

    Why did the pilot not turn off the master switch and save the battery for landing and last minute requirements? That is one of the things that I do when training pilots.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines