• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Soft field takeoff goes awry

By NTSB · May 10, 2016 ·

The pilot stated that the preflight and engine run-up of the Cessna 172F were satisfactory prior to the departure from the 1,641-foot grass runway.

The grass was a little high (estimated to be 5 to 6 inches) and soft due to rain from earlier that week.

He consulted the POH and confirmed no flaps for the takeoff.

After the engine run-up he taxied onto Runway 32 at the airport in Mount Pleasant, Pa., and with the flaps retracted, applied full throttle noting 2,200 rpm, then released the brakes.

He did not begin the takeoff roll utilizing soft field takeoff procedure of aft control input but did as the takeoff roll continued.

He later reported that he “probably didn’t initially have the yoke back enough.”

After a little more than half way down the runway at an airspeed less than 50 mph, he aborted the takeoff. Unable to stop, the plane hit a guard rail at the end of the runway, causing it to nose over.

The piloted noted in the Recommendation Section of the submitted NTSB Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident report that the accident might have been prevented by better assessment of the conditions/effects of the grass and length of the runway, and to either not initiate takeoff or abort sooner.

He also indicated that the accident might have been prevented if “…a perfect soft/short field technique was used.”

Post-accident inspection of the airplane by an FAA airworthiness inspector revealed substantial damage to the right wing spar and structure adjacent to the left main landing gear attach point.

Another FAA inspector reported no obstructions at the departure end of runway 32.

A review of the airplane Owner’s Manual indicates 0 flap extension is specified for normal and maximum performance takeoff, however, 10° of flaps is specified to be used for minimum ground runs or for takeoff from soft or rough fields with no obstacles ahead. The takeoff performance chart does not indicate distances for grass runways.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot’s incorrect takeoff procedures from the soft grass runway and his delay in aborting the takeoff after recognizing slow acceleration.

NTSB Identification: ERA14CA278

This May 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Eric Ziegler says

    May 11, 2016 at 5:55 am

    Given only 1641 feet of mushy grass, the POH suggestion shouldn’t have overridden the common-sense use of flaps. AND a short/soft field technique. Wonder if a brisk headwind wouldn’t have helped this pilot a bit.

  2. Bradley says

    May 10, 2016 at 6:34 pm

    *Thinking* you know something that you *don’t* is worse then simply not knowing.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines