• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Mistimed magneto contributes to crash

By NTSB · May 19, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that before taking off for a local flight in the Piper J-3 in Hopkinsville, Ky., when he conducted the engine run up, the magneto drop for the right magneto was 150 rpm, which was 100 rpm greater than the drop for the left magneto.

He later stated that the “engine ran up just fine.”

He applied takeoff power and, based on his years of experience, estimated that the engine was developing full power.

The airplane became airborne in about the usual time, just before midfield.

He began climbing out between 40 to 50 mph, which he said was normal.

About 10 to 15 seconds later, when the plane was about 100 feet above ground level and with about 1/4 of the runway remaining, he noticed that the engine was not developing full power, which was usually 2400 rpm. The tachometer indicated 1,900 rpm.

He verified that the throttle was full forward, the mixture control was full rich, and the carburetor heat was off.

At 1,900 rpm, there was just enough power to maintain altitude but not enough to climb.

He initiated a shallow turn to try landing on a taxiway, but during the turn, he lost altitude and abandoned the plan. He maneuvered the plane for a forced landing on a road.

During the forced landing, the right wing hit a tree, causing the plane to be pulled to the right over a guardrail, causing one serious and one minor injury.

Inspection of the engine following recovery revealed the right magneto was timed 14° after the specified amount, or closer to top dead center, and discrepancies were noted with both spark plugs in the No. 4 cylinder.

Although the pilot indicated the engine run-up was satisfactory, the excessive right magneto drop was likely due to the mistimed right magneto and the spark plug discrepancies and should have been grounds to cancel the flight and investigate the reason for the excessive drop.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the failure of the pilot to identify poor engine performance during the engine run-up before takeoff.

Also causal to the accident was the mistimed right magneto and the poor condition of the spark plugs in the No. 4 cylinder.

NTSB Identification: ERA14LA253

This May 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Sarah A says

    May 20, 2016 at 9:36 am

    What does not work perfectly on the ground is not likely to work any better in the air. We do all those preflight checks for a very good reason and to just ignore a result that conflicts with your desires to go fly anyways makes them little more than relevant information for the post crash investigation.

  2. C J says

    May 20, 2016 at 8:22 am

    I never seen a Piper J3 fly out at 40/50 mph indicated. If done this way you have no cushion in airspeed as your hanging flight on the propeller alone. As stated well by Paul, why bother checking the mags after the engine starts if you going to go anyway with a known indicated problem. Suspect this was a do it yourself work by the owner (non mechanical type).

  3. Paul says

    May 20, 2016 at 6:39 am

    Why bother with an engine run up to check for discrepancies if you’re just going to ignore them and proceed with takeoff. It becomes little more than a perfunctory exercise in futility.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines