The two pilots were on a multi-leg cross-country trip in the Mooney M20C to visit friends and relatives. Both pilots had current medical certificates, and it could not be determined who was acting as pilot-in-command at the time of the accident.
The pilot seated in the right front seat had owned the airplane for over 20 years and had accumulated considerable experience flying it. Neither pilot had an instrument rating.Post-accident review of meteorological information indicated that at the time of the flight’s departure, the departure and arrival airports were reporting visual meteorological conditions. However, the initial segment of the flight required flight over mountainous terrain where instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and mountain obscuration existed.
There was no record of either pilot having obtained an official weather briefing before the flight. However, they were most likely aware of the mountain obscuration, as it would have been visible before takeoff and during the initial stages of the flight.
The airplane was equipped with a panel-mounted GPS receiver that was capable of providing minimum safe altitude information along a user-defined flight plan, but it is unknown if the pilots were using this feature.
An iPad, which the pilots reportedly used for navigation, was found in the cockpit, however impact damage to the device prevented determination of what navigation software was installed.
Additionally a sectional chart covering the accident area was on board, however, the chart was found stowed in the rear pocket of the left front seat, indicating that the pilots were not using it during the flight.
Radar and weather data revealed that the airplane entered the clouds shortly after takeoff. The flight track began to waver slightly about seven minutes after takeoff, likely due to the airplane being hand-flown as it entered IMC.
The flight track remained generally on course toward the destination airport as the flight progressed, and there was no indication of an attempt to return to the departure airport.
The airplane flew through the mountainous terrain at a fairly consistent altitude about 2,500 feet below the maximum elevation figure of 12,500 feet mean sea level shown on the sectional aeronautical chart for the area and eventually struck the side of a mountain near Cody, Wyo., about 430 feet below its summit. Both pilots were killed in the crash.
The consistency of the airplane’s flight track indicates that the pilots most likely intentionally elected to enter IMC in an effort to fly over the mountainous terrain and into the clearer weather beyond.
The airplane’s altimeter was set to the correct pressure, and post-accident examination did not reveal any anomalies with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.
The investigation was unable to determine why the pilots elected to fly at an altitude below the maximum elevation for the area.
The NTSB determined the probable cause as the non-instrument rated pilots’ decision to continue flight into known instrument meteorological conditions over mountainous terrain, which resulted in controlled flight into terrain.
NTSB Identification: WPR14FA188
This May 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.
Just one simple question: For what reason a pilot with 20 years experience has no instrument rate …?
Not to mention the financial situation to afford a high performance single engine aircraft that was apparently well equipped. Add to that not knowing that normally aspirated aircraft have very real limits when flying in high mountain terrain. What did he do all those years, fly around in a C-150 near sea level ?
How quick to judge
What no general aviation pilot is ever taught is the limited thrust available at higher density altitudes. Ok, so the air has less lift…air has no lift. It’s all about velocity and mass displacement. No! it’s excess thrust available for maneuvering that is lost.
That airplane likely has 700 lbs. thrust at sea-level and requires 250 lbs. sustaining thrust to maintain airborne mass displacement. Assuming 16,000 ft. as max altitude, that means only sustaining thrust remains with a loss of 550 lbs. thrust, or approximately 30 lbs. per thousand of increased altitude. This means 400 lbs. excess at 5,000 ft., 250 lbs. excess thrust at 10,000 ft. A 25-degree banked level turn requires 250 lbs. excess thrust. Anything more will require descent.
And the average IQ of the pilot population goes up.
“Yeah, but collectively, they HAD 147 hours of I-Pad “dual” – doesn’t that count?”
A well equipped aircraft but two pilots with no Instrument Rating, good thing they at least had current medicals.
A stock Mooney would have struggled to get much higher up to clear the mountainous terrain at any guess. A circling climb out might have worked but they had two strikes against them from the start. No weather briefing, and no instrument rating. I use to push the side of stupid in flying safety pilot for an attorney in his Mooney and I thought he was trying to kill us both at times.
Words are inadequate to describe this but one inescapably comes to mind: “Suicide” whether it be intentional or unintentional, we have to assume the latter but the result is the same. Why not just play Russian Roulette with a single round in a revolver to see how long before your luck runs out and it goes off when the trigger is pulled? Would be cheaper, airplane undamaged and less fuel burned.
+1
🙁