• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Beechcraft G58 vs. Diamond DA62

By Ben Sclair · August 31, 2016 ·

I earned my multi-engine rating in a 1973 Beechcraft Baron E55 and flew a few hundred hours in it. For that reason, if I see a Baron G58 on a ramp – or at a fly-in – I have to go look.

Diamond DA62 vs. Beech Baron G58

Admittedly, I have a soft spot for that particular line of twins. The room, comfort and look all appeal to me. That’s what makes having so many options in general aviation so cool. It is hard to find an aircraft that doesn’t fit your personal preference.

And when I look at Diamond’s DA62, I’m more than intrigued. I’ve yet had the opportunity to go for a flight, but much about the design is appealing. The 1,004-pound full fuel payload and the 9 gph max endurance cruise fuel burn cause me to tilt my held like a curious puppy. One of the G58’s IO-550-Bs using lean-of-peak procedures will get close to 9 gph, but you still have to feed the other -550.

Oh, and Jet-A – which is what you’ll fill the DA62 with – is cheaper most everywhere you’ll fly.

AircraftBeechcraft Baron G58Diamond DA62
Length29 ft 10 in30 ft 10 in
Height9 ft 9 in9 ft 3 in
Wingspan37 ft 10 in47 ft 10 in
CABIN
Height50 in–
Width42 in–
Max Occupancy67
WEIGHT
Max Takeoff Weight5,550 lbs5,071 lbs
Empty Weight4,030 lbs3,461 lbs
Useful Load1,494 lbs1,609 lbs
Usable Fuel194 gal89 gal
Fuel Fuel Payload330 lbs1,004 lbs
PERFORMANCE
Max Cruise Speed202 ktas192 ktas
Stall Speed73 kcas61 kias (full flaps)
Max Range1,480 nm1,245 nm
POWERPLANT
EnginesCont. TSIO-550-C (2)Austro AE300 (2)
Power300 hp (2)180 hp (2)
PRICE (2016)$1.2 million$1.1 million

If you’re in the market for a twin… which intrigues you more?

About Ben Sclair

Ben Sclair is the Publisher of General Aviation News, a pilot, husband to Deb and dad to Zenith, Brenna, and Jack. Oh, and a staunch supporter of general aviation.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Pete says

    September 12, 2016 at 2:20 pm

    The real question is what are the single engine climb rates at gross weight? The diamond advertised single engine climb at typical weights, hard to compare.

  2. Phlyboy says

    September 4, 2016 at 2:16 pm

    An afterthought (VERY important). Is the cabin on the DA62 pressurized ?

  3. Phlyboy says

    September 4, 2016 at 2:14 pm

    DA62 is real intriguing, those fuel burns and Diesel engine appeal to me, but that will require a 50′ hangar door !

  4. Rob says

    September 1, 2016 at 8:05 am

    DA62 all day.

  5. Tom Snow says

    September 1, 2016 at 5:47 am

    Stay tuned for my upcoming General Aviation News article on the DA62. I’ve owned a Baron 55 and 58 and the comparisons are interesting.

    Since many of our corporate flights are solo, the fuel burn of a twin caused me to switch to a Bonanza several years ago.

    I love Beechcraft products, but Diamond’s DA62 is impressive and it’s great to see innovation in the world of owner-flown GA.

    • Charlie Wilcox says

      September 1, 2016 at 6:47 am

      Tom, I hope you cover the maintenance intervals and costs associated with the DA-62’s diesel engines vs. the Baron’s Continentals. Also the same with comparison of the composite airframe maintenance & life-limits vs. that of the aluminum airframe. Performance numbers in speed and loads are self explanatory but the hidden costs associated with those two main differences in design would be very interesting to see.

  6. GBigs says

    August 31, 2016 at 3:14 pm

    It is a sleek modern aircraft with all the latest toys and technology, no question. But it is pricey. Neat you can burn Jet-A and that is special. But you will pay well for the privilege to own one.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines