• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

New Kitfox owner killed in familiarization flight

By NTSB · September 6, 2016 ·

The pilot had recently purchased the tailwheel-equipped Kitfox III. He had no experience in tailwheel-equipped airplanes and asked a flight instructor to check him out.

The instructor stated that, although he was an experienced tailwheel pilot, he had no experience in the make and model, so he flew the airplane solo for about five hours to become familiar with it.

The instructor reported that while flying the airplane solo, he noticed that it would become airborne prematurely if he did not hold the control stick full forward on the takeoff run to keep it on the runway while trying to gain airspeed.

He added that he told the owner about this and cautioned him to hold the control stick full forward on takeoff to prevent the plane from becoming airborne inadvertently.

During the accident flight near Lake Stevens, Wash., the owner was in the left seat, and the instructor was in the right seat. The right-seat position was equipped with rudder pedals but not with a control stick.

The instructor said that, during the takeoff run, the airplane became airborne prematurely because the owner failed to hold the control stick full forward as previously instructed. The instructor reported that he told the owner to lower the nose after the airplane became airborne and also tried to reach over to move the control stick forward to get the nose down, but was not successful because the owner had frozen on the controls.

The airplane subsequently stalled due to the loss of sufficient airspeed and hit the ground about 225 feet east of the runway in a steep, nose-down attitude, killing the plane’s owner.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot’s failure to maintain airspeed during initial climb, which resulted in the airplane exceeding its critical angle of attack and experiencing an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the inability of the flight instructor to take control of the airplane due to the lack of fully operational dual controls in the right-seat pilot position.

NTSB Identification: WPR14FA393

This September 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bob Hartmaier says

    September 8, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    I agree, the CG out of limits, the horizontal stab not installed properly, or the trim not working……….

  2. Paul says

    September 8, 2016 at 5:32 am

    This instructor placed himself in harms way unnecessarily due to poor judgement. At the very least he should have had the owner accompany him in the right seat as observer before allowing him into the left seat with particular attention paid to control stick position. Elevator trim or CG or longitudinal control rigging or all of the above were likely sources of the problem of early rotation.

  3. Mike Nellis says

    September 7, 2016 at 9:49 am

    First, what competent instructor would give instruction to a 0 time tailwheel pilot without dual controls?

    Second, does the Kitfox not have elevator trim with a trim setting for takeoff? If, during 5 hours of familiarization flying the instructor couldn’t trim the plane for inadvertent or premature takeoff, then he shouldn’t have been instructing in a plane he couldn’t control.

    Clearly the instructor, as pilot in command during the instruction flight, was negligent in his decision making..

  4. C J says

    September 7, 2016 at 9:07 am

    Sounds like an aft CG on this ship anyway, (tail heavy maybe) the instructor should have seen the wt & bal report to determine if a potential problem existed. I don’t think rigging would have caused such an issue.

  5. John says

    September 7, 2016 at 8:26 am

    Hey Kitfox owners: Is premature liftoff common with this kit? FWIW, I’ve heard from other pilots of odd behaviors by Kitfox aircraft, but not this one.

  6. Bluestar says

    September 7, 2016 at 8:25 am

    So very sad, what started out to be a great experience failed so badly.

  7. Bart says

    September 7, 2016 at 8:16 am

    There’s more to this story than a “premature liftoff”. Out of rig. CG too far aft.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines