• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

NTSB issues Safety Alert on midair collisions

By General Aviation News Staff · November 16, 2016 ·

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The National Transportation Safety Board issued a Safety Alert Nov. 15, 2016, to pilots with suggestions on what they can do to reduce their chances of being involved in a midair collision.

In an effort to illustrate the limitations of the “see and avoid” concept of aircraft separation, the NTSB created a series of animations depicting the pilots’ visual field of view from each of the four airplanes involved in two midair collisions that were investigated by the NTSB in 2015.

The animations show how difficult it can be for pilots to spot converging aircraft that may present a midair collision risk in a dynamic visual environment.

Using 3-D laser equipment, investigators scanned the cockpit windows and surrounding airplane structure of four exemplar airplanes involved in the two midair collisions to create animations that, combined with radar data, provided an approximation of what each pilot likely saw before the crashes.

Investigators also used radar data to reconstruct how in-cockpit technology that provides pilots with graphical and aural alerts of nearby traffic could have made the pilots aware of the approaching aircraft and possibly prevented the collisions.

“These accidents and the animations clearly demonstrate the safety benefit of augmenting pilots’ vision with technological safety nets,” said NTSB Chairman Christopher A. Hart. “Technologies in the cockpit that warn of traffic conflicts through displays or alerts can help pilots become aware of, and maintain separation from, nearby aircraft, even if they have difficulty seeing them.”

On July 7, 2015, a Cessna 150 that had just departed from Moncks Corner, South Carolina, and an F-16 Air Force fighter jet on a training mission collided. An air traffic controller advised the F-16 pilot that the Cessna was a potential traffic conflict. The F-16 pilot was not able to visually acquire the Cessna until it was too late to avoid the collision.

The two occupants of the Cessna were killed; the F-16 pilot ejected and survived.

The NTSB determined that the probable cause of the crash was the air traffic controller’s failure to provide an appropriate resolution to the traffic conflict.

On Aug. 16, 2015, a North American Rockwell Sabreliner inbound for landing at Brown Field Municipal Airport in San Diego and a Cessna 172 that was practicing landings at the same airport collided. The four occupants of the Sabreliner and the sole occupant of the Cessna were killed.

A cockpit visibility study revealed the fields of view of both pilots were limited and partially obscured at times.

The NTSB determined that the probable cause of the accident was the air traffic controller’s failure to properly identify the aircraft in the pattern and to ensure control instructions were being performed.

The NTSB said that contributing to both accidents were the inherent limitations of the “see and avoid” concept of traffic separation. These limitations, combined with errors by the air traffic controllers, resulted in the pilots’ inability to take action to avoid the collisions.

The Safety Alert highlights the value of traffic avoidance technologies to pilots as an aid to detecting and avoiding other airplanes in flight. Such technologies also serve as another layer of safety in the case of air traffic control errors, such as those referenced in the two accidents above.

In addition to issuing the Safety Alert, the NTSB made recommendations to the FAA and the three companies operating federal contract control towers in the U.S., asking them to brief air traffic controllers on the errors in the two midair collisions and to include these accidents as examples in initial and recurrent training.

The Safety Alert, Prevent Midair Collisions: Don’t Depend on Vision Alone, the animations, safety recommendation report, accident reports, and are all available here.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Dale says

    November 25, 2016 at 10:51 am

    It appears that these videos would be useful to make us safer pilots, unfortunately, they cannot be viewed. Instead, we get a message “Please sign in to view this video” yet there is no place to sign in. If you click the Youtube link, it says that the video is private. Is there a point to making the videos un-viewable?

    Thanks for your other good articles and helping educate the general aviation public.

    • Ryan Padgett says

      November 26, 2016 at 11:20 am

      I have the same problem as Dale. What is he point of making a video if it is “private.”

  2. Mark Nye says

    November 24, 2016 at 5:38 am

    The videos are private, I can’t play them.

  3. Jeff says

    November 17, 2016 at 8:16 am

    In the case of the Moncks Corner incident I find it hard to believe no blame was put on the pilot of the F-16. When told to turn immediately he didn’t, when he did turn he used his autopilot and a standard rate turn. He could have avoided the incident by taking immediate action, not delaying to try and see a very small object miles away.
    Read the report.
    The NTSB did go on about TCAS and ADS-B systems to augment the see and avoid. However we have been told many times the military will not be installing ADS-B in their aircraft. The F-16 of 2020 will not be any more capable of picking up a small slow aircraft than they are now, which in this case he didn’t.
    So the military is asking for an exemption to the ADS-B mandate.
    Add to this everything from fighters to C-17 flying at levels as low as 500 feet and well over 250 knots in areas GA aircraft regularly fly.
    The FAA has seen fit to not allow an aircraft with ADS-B IN only to receive data unless they are close to another aircraft that has ADS-B OUT. How is that making things safer?
    Wouldn’t at least a partial solution be for the FAA to open the transmissions so aircraft with IN only can receive ALL the data? How many planes that do not fly, or will not fly, in controlled airspace have ADS-B IN but not OUT? They will never get full coverage. So in fact the FAA instead of making the skies safer is hindering safety!
    Rant over!

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines