• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Student’s second solo goes awry

By NTSB · November 21, 2016 ·

According to the student pilot, he was performing his second solo flight, and he reported a total flying time of 45 hours. As the Cessna 172 became airborne during the initial takeoff, it “…violently veered 90° to the left.”

He immediately applied right rudder and reduced the throttle to idle.

The airplane landed on the left side of the runway in Sarasota, Florida, and it departed the runway surface, into the grass. It then crossed the intersecting runway. As the airplane approached a taxiway, the pilot brought it to a full stop.

An FAA inspector reported that the excursion resulted in a buckling of the engine firewall.

The student pilot did not report any mechanical problems with the airplane at the time of the accident.

A review of local wind conditions at the airport did not reveal evidence of gusts.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the student pilot’s failure to maintain airplane control during the initial climb, resulting in a runway excursion and substantial damage to the engine firewall. The student pilot’s lack of overall flying experience was a factor.

NTSB Identification: ERA15CA056

This November 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Doug Rodrigues says

    January 31, 2017 at 4:41 am

    Anyone with 45 hours only on a second solo should do some serious soul searching. Seems to me that this person isn’t pilot material. This person may eventually pass a flight check, but as a Pilot or as an Airplane Driver? Many decades ago I tried talking one ham fisted / no pilot ability student out of learning how to fly. He went to another CFI at a different airport who soloed him off two weeks later. That student literally crashed on his first solo. Some people just don’t have any ability to develop a “feel” for the plane. Those are the ones I refer to as Airplane Drivers.

    • Wylbur Wrong says

      January 31, 2017 at 6:44 am

      I did that soul searching. And I persevered through various life issues that got in the way of me getting a PPL. So I passed the first check ride at something over 100 hours. And then passed the IR check ride first time. Passed the Commercial written first try.

      Checked out in C77R, Cherokee-6 300, and now a Lance.

      I guess I’m not cut out to be a pilot by your standards. You are also one of those CFIs I’ve learned to avoid.

  2. Wylbur Wrong says

    November 26, 2016 at 11:41 am

    Ok, I had to come to this student’s rescue.

    A C77R I flew did nearly the same to me (Cardinal RG).

    Landed center of the runway, and as I lost rudder authority, it decided to turn left. Full right rudder had ZERO effect. Right brake to nearly lock of the wheel got me turned back toward center and finally stopped.

    Seems there was a problem with the connection from the right rudder peddles to the nose gear. It happened between Vr on take off and nose wheel touching runway on landing.

    I’ve seen the same happen to a C152. The nose gear “bungy” cord had a weak spot.

    I’m not a mechanic, but I’m told the design is the same for C150-182 linkages.

    So, I too, question the NTSB report as given.

  3. Kevin Smith says

    November 23, 2016 at 5:54 am

    The only response I have is to question even more and trust even less the NTSB. See: “Sully”, motion picture.

    • Graeme Smith says

      November 26, 2016 at 7:46 am

      The NTSB – as portrayed in that movie is a fiction. It bears no relation to the transcripts of the real investigation. Eastwood introduced it to create tension in the movie. The real Sullenburger was so embarrassed by it that he insisted the real names of NTSB staff were not used. Unlike the rest of the movie where real names for roles are used.

  4. Eric Ziegler says

    November 22, 2016 at 9:52 am

    Guys, I see it differently. While 45 hours is a lot of accumulated time before a second solo (maybe his or his instructor’s judgment was a factor), the student displayed the instincts and knowledge to get the bird slowed and pointed in the right direction for an appropriate full stop. While some students’ reach exceeds their grasp, as an instructor I’d rather see this outcome than that of a weinie roast. And I’ve never experienced a violent 90-degree turn to the left from either p-factor or ‘slipstream'(?).

    • Kevin Smith says

      November 23, 2016 at 5:55 am

      ?? ?? ? ??

  5. walter m krupnak says

    November 22, 2016 at 9:44 am

    Once again, I think we have lowered our standards as instructors and teachers just to get the almighty dollar.

  6. PeterH says

    November 22, 2016 at 8:24 am

    Second solo after 45 hours? Maybe a bass boat would be better…

    • C J says

      November 22, 2016 at 9:15 am

      Right on Peter, when I had 45 hours I was checked out in my Champ 7AC, a J-3, a 7ECA and a C150 (needed a radio). I may have been mislead by my instructors. Or, maybe this student was instructed (loosely) by an output of a pilot factory as so many are nowadays. I had better rethink my errors so this doesn’t happen to me.

  7. GBigs says

    November 22, 2016 at 7:23 am

    How did the student get a solo signoff if they lacked the basic skill to deal with p-factor and slip-stream?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines