• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Fuel exhaustion leads to complete loss of engine power

By NTSB · November 23, 2016 ·

The pilot reported that the Piper PA 28-181 was operated on a visual flight rules night flight. He estimated that the plane had about 30 to 32 gallons of fuel prior to departure from the Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (BJC) in Denver, Colorado.

During the flight, intermittent electrical issues were experienced, including static in the headsets, flickering instrument panel lights, and a fluctuating ammeter gauge. Attempts were made to alleviate the electrical issues to no avail.

A touch and go landing was made at the Kit Carson Airport (ITR) in Burlington, Colorado, and a decision was made to shorten the flight and return to the departure airport.

The pilot reported that the fuel gauges indicated the plane had about 8 gallons remaining in each fuel tank about his time.

After 20 minutes had elapsed from the departure from ITR, the fuel gauges showed empty. The engine stopped producing power and the pilot switched to the opposite fuel tank. The engine restarted and the flight continued for about 4 to 5 more minutes when the engine again stopped producing power.

During the forced landing attempt near Strasburg, Colorado, the plane struck wires and subsequently hit the ground, resulting in one minor injury.

The pilot and the flight instructor stated that the airplane’s fuel load prior to departure should have been sufficient for a flight of about three hours. The total duration of the accident flight was about 2.25 hours.

Examination of the airplane after the accident revealed no fuel remaining in either wing tank. There was no evidence of a fuel spill and no preimpact anomalies were found with respect to the airplane’s fuel system.

The pilot reported that the accident could have been prevented by ordering more fuel prior to departure or obtaining fuel at ITR.

Based on the available information, it is likely that the airplane’s fuel supply was exhausted, resulting in a complete loss of engine power. It is also possible that the observed fuel gauge reading were innacurate given the electrical problems encountered during the flight.

The NTSB determined the probable cause as the exhaustion of the fuel supply resulting in a complete loss of engine power.

NTSB Identification: CEN15CA055

This November 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Hans says

    November 24, 2016 at 3:10 pm

    Another “you can’t fix stupid” statement is made.

    • JimH. says

      November 24, 2016 at 4:59 pm

      Hans, I agree. Some of us call it ‘stupid pilot tricks’.
      Is takes only minutes to stick the tanks and know pretty closely how much fuel there is.
      Then, to keep flying at night with an electrical issue is truly foolish, not to mention ‘careless and reckless’…91.13 .!

  2. Warren says

    November 24, 2016 at 10:24 am

    If you want to depart with less than full tanks, a properly calibrated fuel stick for that particular airplane will let you know exactly what is in the tanks.

  3. Eric Ziegler says

    November 24, 2016 at 8:02 am

    I will leave the flying of PA-28’s with electrical problems, at night and in the Rockies, to “braver” souls like these.

    • John says

      November 24, 2016 at 4:21 pm

      You hit it. Electrical problems = Airplane neither Airworthy nor safe for night flight. Hence they should never have departed ITR, their T&G airport. The loss of power due to fuel exhaustion was merely the nail that closed the coffin THIS time. It could easily have been total loss of all electrical systems followed by spatial disorientation followed by stall/spin, CFIT, or an inflight fire.

      The CFI (I hope) will have serious discussions with the FAA about why he or she shouldn’t face suspension of both CFI certificates and CPL for “careless and reckless” (14 CFR 91.13), plus violations for knowingly flying an aircraft that was both unairworthy and unsafe to fly (See 14 CFR 91.7 (a) and (b). The regs are crystal clear: ” The pilot in command shall discontinue the flight when unairworthy mechanical, electrical, or structural conditions occur.” Absent a (continuously functional!) electrical system the aircraft was also not legal for night flight (14 CFR 91.205 (a), (b), and (c). If the flying pilot had his license (wasn’t a student pilot) then the bucket of very hot water is roomy enough for two.

      Both individuals need serious remedial training on how to make “good” decisions!

  4. djc says

    November 24, 2016 at 7:44 am

    Having been a pilot since the 60’s, this problem of running out of gas so often is an embarrassment that harms the ‘image’ of GA. If we told the truth to non-pilots – that 5-10% of all accidents are because we ran out of gas – we’d be laughed at!

    We have identified our worst enemy, “they” is us! (Pogo)

  5. TomC says

    November 24, 2016 at 7:34 am

    How tough could it have been to slosh a couple gallons in at Kit Carson? I don’t think 8-gallons allows for 45-minute reserve, does it?

    Engines have a nasty habit of not producing power when they run out of fuel.

  6. Randy Coller says

    November 24, 2016 at 6:36 am

    One of the basic rules of flying….”fuel gauges lie.”

    • Glenn says

      November 24, 2016 at 8:47 am

      Yup, another set of Darwin twins. This time they lived to tell. Sorry for repeating myself.

      FUEL TOTALIZER

      But you do need to remember to hit the fill up reset button.
      And for the math impaired, it might be useful for one per tank on a low wing.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines