• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Low altitude maneuvers fatal

By NTSB · January 10, 2017 ·

Several witnesses observed the Aventura II during engine start at the airport in Sebring, Florida, and reported that, when the engine started, it tipped forward onto its nose and then fell back and its tail struck the ground.

The pilot exited the airplane, walked to the back, returned to the cockpit, and then taxied out.

No witnesses reported seeing the pilot examine the underside of the tail or the elevators after the tail strike.

A video recording made by one of the witnesses after the tail strike showed that the airplane departed, climbed to about 300 feet above ground level (agl), made a 180° left turn, and performed a pass down the runway in the opposite direction of the takeoff.

A few seconds later, after executing another 180° turn, the plane performed another low pass down the runway, this time in the direction of the takeoff.

The plane then entered a left turn, the bank angle increased until the wings were almost perpendicular to the ground, the nose of the airplane dropped, and the airplane descended in a nose-down attitude to ground impact, killing both souls on board.

The airplane came to rest on its nose with the fuselage nearly perpendicular to the ground.

Post-accident examination revealed that the elevator trim cable was separated from the trim tab. Although it is possible the trim cable disconnected when the tail struck the ground during engine start (and would have been noticeable to the pilot if he had looked), the investigation could not conclusively determine when the trim cable separated or whether the separation contributed to the pilot’s loss of airplane control.

It is likely that, during the low altitude flyby, the pilot inadvertently entered an aerodynamic stall while maneuvering and did not have sufficient altitude to recover.

The NTSB determined the probable cause the pilot’s failure to maintain control while maneuvering at low altitude, which led to the airplane exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and experiencing an aerodynamic stall.

NTSB Identification: ERA15FA102

This January 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Wylbur Wrong says

    February 2, 2017 at 7:48 am

    I don’t know the design specs for the Aventura II.

    I do have a problem with “when the engine started, it tipped forward onto its nose and then fell back and its tail struck the ground”.

    Looking at pictures of this aircraft, the main gear wheels should have been significantly ahead of the CG to where a full throttle start while holding the brakes should not have caused this problem. Otherwise, one could not do a full throttle run up to set for Max Power.

    This is indicative of the CG being forward beyond the design limit from where I sit.

    So I doubt that the pilot had sufficient elevator authority to handle the turn. And if the trim control cable broke at that point…

    Me thinks the NTSB missed the problem on this one — excessively forward CG.

  2. Paul says

    January 11, 2017 at 8:48 am

    The lack of longitudinal trim should not have caused loss of control. The pilot was out of control from the time he started the airplane until it crashed.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines