• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Failure to remove gust lock bends 172

By NTSB · May 23, 2017 ·

The pilot reported that during the takeoff roll, he tried to abort the takeoff because he had not removed the bolt he had placed in the yoke for a gust lock.

He reported that the crosswind pushed the Cessna 172 off the right side of the runway at the airport in Sussex, N.J., into the grass, the airplane hit trees, and sustained substantial damage to both wings and the empennage.

The pilot reported that the accident was due to him not removing the bolt in the yoke.

He added there were no pre-impact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation.

Probable cause: The pilot’s failure to remove the gust lock during the preflight inspection, resulting in a loss of control and collision with trees during takeoff.

NTSB Identification: GAA15CA088

This May 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Rich says

    May 27, 2017 at 6:56 am

    Jaymar Ruby the men’s clothier had their King Air run off the end of the runway at Meig’s several years ago for the same reason.
    I guess I was taught “Controls free and CORRECT” to the point it is ingrained in me.
    I might do something dumb some day but I doubt it will THAT.

  2. marvin says

    May 24, 2017 at 9:02 pm

    That is why you have your check list on the sun visor.

  3. John says

    May 24, 2017 at 7:57 am

    Kudos to the pilot for recognizing the contol problem and dealing with it ON THE GROUND, during his takeoff run. Overlooking “controls FREE and CORRECT” is not just a failing of pilots who fly bug smashers. Within the last few years military pilots (placed a Jep manual under rudder pedal during maintenance check of rudder on the ground) and ‘professional’ civilian CJ crews (lax organizational culture – only 7 control checks in prior 160 flights) have failed to perform that simple, but essential check. At least this pilot escaped with minimal injuries.. He (as have many other pilots) used a bolt (no flag or streamer) as hia control lock. ‘Pro’ crews and many GA pilots who used bolts, pencils, jep manuals, or who simply failed to follow their checklists haven’t been so fortunate. As others have said, “Complacency Kills”. So does intentional use of unapproved parts.

    • MAURICE STANDER says

      May 24, 2017 at 9:13 am

      I used to be F/O on DC-3. Many times we would leave the rudder gust lock in place, because taxiing with a strong wind would be almost impossible to direct the plane due to the large surface area of the rudder. Right before take-off, I would go out and retrieve the gust lock. It was part of our mental game to remember to remove or else no go.

  4. MAURICE STANDER says

    May 24, 2017 at 5:22 am

    It is called complacency. It happens, our training is supposed to overide that tendency.

  5. Jeremy M says

    May 23, 2017 at 10:07 am

    For the life of me I cannot comprehend how a pilot fails to notice that a gust lock is still in place until it’s too late. Going through the checklist or even placing the controls during taxi appropriate for crosswinds should confirm this. I’m sorry but I have no sympathy for the pilot in this case.

    • Jim Macklin CFIIASME and A&P says

      May 24, 2017 at 4:39 am

      My thought exactly. Every student pilot is taught to visually check Flight Controls Free and Correct.
      Right one UP, Left one down, Elevator up, Elevator down.
      In the typical trainer the pilots can see see the control surfaces and the controls can be boxed, control forward and right, then full aft, the full left and full forward. It only takes a few seconds to verify.
      Airplanes coming out of maintenance have had control cables wrong on the pulleys and crashes are almost always the result.
      Verify the correct routing of the controls.

      • C 172 Pilot says

        June 9, 2017 at 3:17 pm

        Correct me if I’m wrong but this bolt would not have impeded the rudders for directional control to keep aircraft on runway.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines