WASHINGTON, D.C. – Democrats are rejecting President Trump’s plans to privatize America’s air traffic control system, instead introducing legislation to stabilize FAA funding.
Rep. Rick Larsen (Washington), the top-ranking Democrat on the House Aviation Subcommittee, joined by Rep. Peter DeFazio (Oregon) and other Democrats on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, introduced H.R. 2800, the Aviation Funding Stability Act of 2017, on June 7, 2017.
The proposed legislation aims to strengthen and speed up the reforms taking place at the FAA and its air traffic control system through the NextGen initiative.
“This bill meaningfully complements NextGen’s progress,” said Larsen. “By providing certainty to the FAA’s funding streams and boosting reforms to the FAA’s personnel and procurement systems, this bill presents an opportunity to accelerate modernization of the FAA, which is something I think folks on both sides of the aisle can get behind.”
“If we truly want to fix the real problems facing the FAA today, the solution is simple: Congress can and should pass targeted reforms. Today, Democrats on the Transportation Committee offered targeted measures that guarantee that investments in our aviation system are not subject to Congressional dysfunction,” said DeFazio. “Our alternative provides a stable, predictable funding stream for aviation programs; directs the FAA to run modernization programs using streamlined best practices; requires the FAA to reform its personnel system; gives users a bigger role in managing the aviation system through the FAA’s Management Advisory Council; and authorizes funding to rebuild and modernize aging air traffic control facilities. Targeted reforms can achieve our common objectives without jeopardizing our nation’s outstanding aviation safety record. I urge my Republican colleagues to reject ATC privatization, and support our proposal for real, achievable modernization and reform.”
The Aviation Funding Stability Act of 2017 would help ensure investments in the U.S. aviation system are not subject to Congressional dysfunction and would streamline the acquisition of NextGen technology, equipment certification, and ATC management, lawmakers noted.
Key provisions include:
- Provide the FAA with mandatory spending authority in order to maintain stable, predictable FAA funding.
- Ensure that revenues collected from flying passengers (i.e. ticket taxes) are invested in the aviation system. Beginning Oct. 1, Trust Fund revenues and uncommitted cash balance are immediately available to be invested in the aviation system. These funds are not subject to appropriation, budget sequestration, or any directive of the Office of Management and Budget – the funds are off budget. In addition, the bill authorizes such sums as necessary from the General Fund for FAA Operations to address any possible shortfall in Trust Fund revenues, and it exempts any General Fund share from sequestration.
- Require top-to-bottom reforms of the FAA’s personnel and procurement systems. In 1995 and 1996, Congress exempted the FAA from government-wide personnel and procurement rules. But the Department of Transportation Inspector General has often reported that the FAA has not taken full advantage of these reforms, leading to delays and cost overruns in modernization programs and low workforce productivity. The bill requires the FAA to develop a streamlined procurement system that is up to the task of governing high-tech, high-value acquisitions in NextGen technology. It also requires the FAA to update its personnel management system to provide incentives for good performance, among other things. With these reforms, the FAA will be able to institute personnel and procurement reform.
- Elevate the role of the FAA Management Advisory Council (MAC), a government-industry panel that advises the FAA administrator on strategic issues facing the FAA. The bill requires the administrator to respond in writing to each recommendation of the MAC with respect to management of the air traffic control system within 90 days of receipt. If the administrator disagrees with the recommendation, the administrator must explain his or her rationale. If the administrator agrees with the recommendation, the response must include a timeline for implementation.
- Removes bureaucratic barriers within the FAA. The bill directs the agency to cross-utilize staff across disciplines wherever feasible and to break down internal silos so employees can freely share ideas, and so that offices can better collaborate and coordinate with one another in managing complex tasks like certifying new airliner designs and running the air traffic control system.
- Authorize funds to rebuild and modernize aging air traffic control facilities across the United States. The bill authorizes the FAA to use the uncommitted balance of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund to rebuild, modernize, and sustain air traffic control facilities.
President Trump recently announced a plan that would privatize ATC, leave the FAA’s critical safety oversight processes without a funding source, and jeopardize aviation safety by subjecting the remaining FAA to Congressional shutdowns, budget cuts, and sequestration.
Under the Trump plan, a private corporation would have the power to tax the flying public to pay for the ATC system without Congressional oversight or judicial review. The Trump plan severely limits current public participation requirements regarding aircraft noise when adjusting airspace routes over homes across the United States, Democratic lawmakers say.
Well, the proposed new FAA funding plan.
Perhaps replying to the post that asks the question, as opposed to just doing a general post might make this a bit more readable, followable, etc.? Just say’n’.
And now, I’m wondering if you were trying to reply to my query about how much the airlines put into the Trust Fund vs. GA, and how fast this will get spent if this is used to fund the FAA and not just ATC.
If the airlines are going to contribute appropriately to the fund, we need to make sure that all the costs that are covered for them are now billed to them via the Federal Fuel Excise taxes.
I got curious about how much money is going into the Trust Fund. So I decided to look up what a 737 burns in fuel per hour. Then I did some simple extrapolations. Yes, on the ground that plane burns more fuel than it does at 10,000 MSL. But for the sake of a comparison, we have to start somewhere.
If my figures are correct on the excise taxes paid for that Jet fuel, the airlines pay $0.003/gal. Avgas for non-airline types is $0.21/gal. For a 2.5 hour flight, based on what a Lance burns (non-turbo) average , that works out to be about $8.93 into the Trust Fund. For the Airline operated 737 that works out to be $11.25 into the Trust Fund.
737 burning between 1000-2000 GPH, gives an average of 1500 * 2.5 * 0.003 = $11.25.
P32R burning avg 17GPH based on a 3.5 hour flight with cruise being 14GPH, 2.5 * 17 * 0.21 = $8.925
So the airlines have a pretty sweet deal. Southwest flies about 7 legs a day, so that works out to be $70-80/day for operations. Plus any landing, ramp, handling fees. One wonders what would happen if they were to pay, say, $0.05/gal to cover it all. That would give $187.50 for a 2.5 hour flight. Would this cover all the costs of operations — landing, ramp, handling, ATC?
Understand, all the excise taxes here are Federal. Airlines do not pay state excise taxes (according to all my research).
What I am afraid of is the Trust Fund being drained for the Airline airports and GA getting very little so that we end up with a higher Federal excise tax.
It wasn’t done in secret, it wasn’t done without research and careful analysis, it isn’t designed to hurt as many people as possible, it won’t result in millions of deaths from not having something owed to all living creatures and it does minor things like maintain the viability and integrity of an entity important to the entire aviation community large and small. When’s last time you heard about THE OTHERS doing anything like this intended to help anyone in any way?
You might want to clarify what “IT” is???