• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Surviving an engine failure while flying straight up in a Pitts

By Ben Sclair · November 2, 2017 ·

Chad Barber survived an engine failure during an aerobatics routine in a Pitts Special and it’s all on video.

What Happened

Chad had just completed a negative G maneuver followed by a four-point roll then a pitch up to vertical. At this point 22 seconds into the video, the engine hiccups and quits.

Trading altitude (2,500′) for airspeed, Chad dives in an attempt to aerodynamically re-start the engine. The blades turn a few times, but doesn’t restart the engine.

Twenty-one seconds after the engine quit, Chad is at 1,000’ and turning toward a gravel road. While setting himself up to land, he then uses the electric starter, which finally starts the engine.

Why It Happened

Like many aerobatic planes, the Pitts has an inverted fuel system. Chad’s Pitts has a 19 gallon fuel tank that feeds fuel into a flexible hose with a weight on the end called a flop tube. Gravity being a constant, both the fuel in the tank and the flop tube will always seek the “bottom” of the tank.

Flop tube as seen inside Pete Miller‘s RV-7 fuel tank project.

Chad makes a habit of never flying aerobatics with less than 6 gallons of fuel, including this flight. In this situation, an extended negative G maneuver caused the flop tube to lose contact with the fuel, which starved the engine of fuel.

Lessons Learned

Over time, the flop tube in Chad’s Pitts lost some flexibility, which made it harder to reach the available fuel as the fuel level decreased. The flop tube has since been replaced.

Old v. new shows decreased flop tube flexibility courtesy Biplane Forums.

Chad has also increased his personal fuel minimum for negative G maneuvers to no less than 10 gallons in the tank.

Chad Barber has been an active pilot for six years and resides in Palm Beach, Fla. As owner of Barber Aviation, Chad provides aircraft delivery, aerobatic training, aerial photography, and aviation management services.

About Ben Sclair

Ben Sclair is the Publisher of General Aviation News, a pilot, husband to Deb and dad to Zenith, Brenna, and Jack. Oh, and a staunch supporter of general aviation.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. GARY says

    November 7, 2017 at 11:09 am

    Despite some of the above comments, nice job! You kept your head, flew the plane, worked the problem, and in the end you were successful in restarting the engine and returned to home base with neither you nor your aircraft damaged. Had it not restarted you were already lined up for what appeared to be an uneventful off airport landing. It just doesn’t get better than that … well done!

  2. CHOPPERGIRL says

    November 3, 2017 at 9:09 pm

    His battery/starter is weakass, maybe he ought to replace that as well, instead of loading up with more fuel. If my car runs out of gas, and I put more gas in it, and the starter on my car is barely able to turn over the engine to restart it, I’m not going to just “fix it” by filling up the gas tank more next time.

  3. Dave says

    November 3, 2017 at 7:58 pm

    Great post, thanks.

  4. Paul says

    November 3, 2017 at 5:36 pm

    Wondering why or how the “flop tube” looses flexibility over time since its constantly being lubricated by the fuel but it is what it is.

    • Simon Sez says

      November 4, 2017 at 2:05 am

      Fuel is no lubricant, it is a combustible

    • Daniel says

      November 4, 2017 at 6:02 pm

      Fuel doesn’t lubricate as far as I know…

    • John Goscinski says

      November 5, 2017 at 4:20 am

      Not sure why you assume avgas would be a preservative. Gas causes hardening in many hose materials over time.

    • JOHN White says

      May 6, 2018 at 2:56 am

      It is a reaction from the components in the fuel to the material inside the tube. A well know problem with floor tubes made from older type materials.

  5. Richard says

    November 3, 2017 at 7:57 am

    Headline is a bit OTT I think.

    • John says

      November 3, 2017 at 10:19 am

      Pun intended?

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines