• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Loss of control fatal

By NTSB · November 3, 2017 ·

The non-instrument-rated private pilot departed on a cross-country flight in night visual meteorological conditions in the Flight Design CTLS.

After takeoff, the pilot leveled the airplane at an altitude about 1,400 feet mean sea level (msl) and continued toward the destination airport for about 30 minutes until he requested and was cleared by air traffic control to fly along a coastal shoreline at 400 feet msl, under the 500-foot shelf of Class Bravo airspace.

About one minute after the pilot was cleared to descend, at an altitude of 700 feet and 0.2 nautical mile from the lateral limits of the Class Bravo shelf, the airplane began a 90° right turn. The airplane deviated from the course to the destination and did not level off at 400 feet, as requested.

The LSA continued on a southeasterly heading and descended to 200 feet before radar contact was lost. There were no radio communications or other indications of distress from the airplane before the loss of radar contact. The pilot died in the crash.

A witness reported seeing the airplane descending at a 45° angle into the water near Queens, N.Y. A pilot involved with the search and recovery of the airplane classified the conditions as “pitch black.”

The pilot was neither qualified nor proficient to conduct the flight by reference to instruments, and had likely used lights on the shoreline as a ground reference in the dark light conditions.

However, when he turned away from the shoreline to continue his descent, likely to avoid entering the Class Bravo airspace, he did not have adequate external visual cues by which to maintain attitude and altitude. He likely became spatially disoriented, and lost control of the airplane.

Although toxicological testing was positive for hydroxyzine, an antihistamine, the drug was detected in muscle tissue and not in blood, indicating that it likely had no impairing effect.

Probable cause: The non-instrument-rated pilot’s spatial disorientation and subsequent loss of airplane control while maneuvering at low altitude, over water with no visible horizon, in dark night conditions, which resulted in a collision with the water.

NTSB Identification: ERA16FA031

This November 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. gbigs says

    November 6, 2017 at 8:14 am

    First, the aircraft was an SLSA so why assume the issue was primarily a non-instrument rating problem? Was this a guy flying on BasicMed? Was this a Sport Pilot? Was this a low private pilot? Was this someone who did not live in the area and was not familiar with the terrain and sea? Was it routine for people to fly so low to avoid a Bravo shelf? A 200 foot AGL flight is already a dangerous thing to try over terrain or ocean.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines