• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Skydiving pilot crashes during precautionary landing

By NTSB · December 8, 2017 ·

The commercial pilot of the Pacific Aerospace 750XL reported he was preparing to release skydivers when he noticed that the engine torque indication was in the red arc.

The gauge was indicating a torque of 70 pounds per square inch (psi) when it should have been indicating about 25 psi. The maximum allowed torque indication was 64.5 psi.

The skydivers jumped uneventfully. As the pilot was returning to the airport, the torque gauge was indicating 80 psi while the engine was at idle. At that time, he decided to perform a precautionary engine shutdown and land with no engine power.

During the landing, the plane was fast and touched down about halfway down the 3,402′ asphalt runway at the airport in Raeford, N.C.

He applied heavy braking, but the plane traveled about 1,000′ beyond the departure end of the runway before coming to rest upright in a field with a collapsed left main landing gear.

Two examinations of the engine did not reveal any pre-impact anomalies or evidence of overtorque.

A test of the torque-indicating transducer and gauge also did not reveal any anomalies.

The examinations did reveal that an automotive-type wiring bundle was used to wire the torque transducer to the airplane’s electrical system. Although it is possible that the wiring bundle could have caused an intermittent faulty torque indication, subsequent testing was unable to duplicate the problem.

The airplane was manufactured about 10 years before the accident, and the torque meter manufacturer upgraded the wiring connectors about four years before the accident.

Probable cause: The pilot’s failure to obtain the proper touchdown point and speed during a precautionary landing with the engine shut down. Contributing to the accident was an erroneous engine torque indication, which led the pilot to shut the engine down, for reasons that could not be determined during post-accident testing.

NTSB Identification: ERA16LA059

This December 2015 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Paul says

    December 11, 2017 at 10:05 am

    Over torquing at IDLE? Really? If it’s still running and not shaking itself apart, spitting oil or burning then leave it running at idle if it’s the only engine you have and make a slightly higher and faster approach than normal using power as needed in close.

  2. Tom says

    December 11, 2017 at 7:33 am

    Really! If it isn’t burning or coming apart leave it alone and land.

    • Guy Huse says

      December 14, 2017 at 7:09 am

      “automotive type wiring bundle” leads me to suspect that the bundle may (probably) have had commercial connector(s), which have either tin-lead or no plating. I’ve had long experience with these types of “connections”, which gradually oxidize and make poor/intermittent connection, with resulting errors in performance. Disconnecting the transducer and bench testing it, and the indicator, would have wiped the contacts and cured the problem. Seen it many times; it also occurs with computer boards!

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines