The airline transport pilot was conducting a personal cross-country flight. He reported he configured the Cessna 340A to land at his destination airport in Bakersfield, California.
However, during his instrument panel scan, he observed a warning light indicating that the right main landing gear (MLG) was not locked in the extended position.
He departed the traffic pattern and attempted to troubleshoot the indication by cycling the landing gear without success.
He subsequently returned to the airport and used the hand crank to manually deploy the gear, but continued to receive the “gear unlocked” indication.
The airplane touched down normally, but as the pilot attempted a right turn to exit the runway, the right MLG collapsed, which resulted in substantial damage to the right aileron.
Post-accident examination of the landing gear revealed that the right MLG aft drive tube, which supplies overcenter tension to the aft bellcrank and side brace lock link when the MLG is in the extended position, failed in tensile overload.
According to an airplane manufacturer representative, low overcenter tension, which is typically a result of improper rigging, will cause the MLG to collapse when it is under load in the extended position.
If the MLG collapses while it is in the extended positon, the aft drive tube will fracture in tensile overload.
According to the airplane service manual, the landing gear must be re-rigged following any adjustment to the gear down-lock tension.
However, a representative of the pilot’s maintenance provider reported that maintenance personnel had not complied with this service manual requirement after adjusting the MLG down-lock tension in 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Therefore, it is likely that maintenance personnel’s failure to re-rig the MLG in accordance with the manual requirements led to its being improperly rigged and to the subsequent collapse of the right MLG.
Probable cause: Maintenance personnel’s repeated failure to re-rig the main landing gear (MLG) in accordance with the airplane manufacturer’s service manual requirements, which resulted in the collapse of the right MLG.
NTSB Identification: WPR16LA058
This January 2016 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.
Yep Ehan, he’s the guy…
Perfect reason not to buy or fly a piston single with retractable gear. You can’t avoid them on jets.
Really…The Cessna 340 is a twin engine 4 seater, not single. Retracts are occasionally problematic but very beneficial in performance gains. Also…Aren’t you the guy that points out every accident involving maintenance on an experimental by the owner? Any comments on the “professional maintainers” in this case?