• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Long cross-country ends in crash

By NTSB · May 1, 2018 ·

The pilot was completing a cross-country flight from Florida to Wisconsin. He said he got a full night’s sleep before departing on the flight around 11 a.m.

About 3:30 a.m., he was approaching the airport in Clintonville, Wisconsin, for the third and final fuel stop of the trip.

Although the surface observation at the airport indicated that night visual meteorological conditions prevailed, he noticed that, as he approached the airport, the runway and precision approach path indicator (PAPI) lights were partially obscured by ground fog.

About 250′ above ground level on final approach, the PAPI lights indicated that the airplane was below the approach path, and the pilot attempted to correct by applying engine power.

He reported the landing felt normal, then the nose landing gear “gave out,” and the airplane skidded about 300′ down the runway before coming to rest.

Examination of the runway revealed tire skid marks consistent with the airplane touching down about 40′ right of the runway centerline at the beginning of the paved surface.

The Beech A23’s left horizontal stabilizer displayed an indentation and paint transfer consistent with impact with a runway threshold light.

It is possible that the pilot may have lost visual contact with the airport environment due to ground fog as the airplane neared the runway, which resulted in the short and right-of-centerline landing.

Although he said he did not feel tired during the flight, it is likely he was experiencing symptoms of fatigue as a result of his extended time awake prior to the accident.

Probable cause: The pilot’s failure to maintain the proper glidepath during the night visual approach, which resulted in hitting a runway threshold light, and his improper landing flare, which resulted in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s fatigue.

NTSB Identification: CEN16LA206

This May 2016 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Bill says

    May 3, 2018 at 9:48 am

    The FAA detail report ends with

    “The examination of the airplane revealed that the leading edge of the left horizontal stabilizer was dented and had a yellow paint transfer mark on it. The nose landing gear had collapsed. The nose wheel was lodged under the airplane and it formed an indentation into the belly skin. Both wings exhibited buckling and twisting with damage to the wing spars. ”

    The plane hit the ground really hard to do this much damage. Not sure I really got that from the overview in the article.

  2. Craig Sanders says

    May 2, 2018 at 12:50 pm

    Why was there only a single pilot on such a long trip?

  3. geebig says

    May 2, 2018 at 6:58 am

    No one should be flying over 15 hours straight solo on a long cross country. And was the guy on an instrument flight plan to be trying to land below minimums in Wisconsin?

  4. Rich says

    May 2, 2018 at 5:06 am

    He should have started that trip at 07:00 not 11:00.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines