• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilot’s complacency blamed for gear-up landing

By NTSB · April 15, 2019 ·

The pilot in the multiengine, retractable-gear-equipped airplane reported that he was flying in instrument meteorological conditions and leveled off at 8,000′ mean sea level.

He began to configure the Piper PA-34 for cruise flight, then realized that the right engine cross-feed fuel selector was positioned for the left tank. The left tank fuel indicator displayed empty, and the right fuel indicator displayed 45 gallons remaining.

He believed that the fuel indicators had malfunctioned, and he established an approach to a nearby highway intersection. The pilot landed with the landing gear stowed on the asphalt highway near Llano, Texas.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to the lower fuselage longerons.

Per the National Transportation Safety Board Pilot Aircraft Accident Report, the pilot reported that he became complacent during the flight and vowed to use a checklist in the future.

The pilot has coordinated with his local FAA Safety Team to help prevent similar accidents from occurring in the future.

The pilot added there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Probable cause: The pilot’s complacency during the en route phase of flight, which resulted in fuel mismanagement and a subsequent gear-up landing.

NTSB Identification: GAA17CA233

This April 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Nick says

    April 16, 2019 at 3:20 pm

    The pilot’s written statement and the accident summary do not corroborate. Check the “Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1” at this link:
    http://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms/search/dockList.cfm?mKey=9500

    It sounds like he never realized the crossfeed lever was turned. Making this flight several times his expectation bias said, “The gauges are wrong I always have an hour of fuel at this point” and that’s right when BOTH engines stopped and it became an emergency. He glided to the highway intersection.

    The summary makes it sound like he knew what the problem was, that both engines were still running and he decided to do an off airport landing anyways.

    • Sarah A says

      April 16, 2019 at 9:04 pm

      That is some serious editorial summarizing on the part of the NTSB to say the least and puts the incident in a very different light. From my own education as related to an engine out landing in complex aircraft, the gear stays up until a safe landing is assured. That landing gear can raise drag considerably and better to land gear up on good terrain then gear down in the trees. Still even the most basic GUMP check, even if most of those letters did not apply, would have told the pilot to drop the gear once he was safely lined up.

      One would like to think that a pilot with this level of experience would not be so complacent even in an emergency situation. Just look to the famous Miracle on the Hudson, those pilots were in deep stuff but they kept their heads and still ran the checklists to attempt engine restart in the time they had left and stayed professional through it all. Sure they had years more experience and excellent training but we should all aspire to that level of professionalism every time we get in the cockpit. For most of us flying is not our profession but flying requires professionalism or it will find your shortcomings and smack you to the ground, literally.

    • Nick says

      April 17, 2019 at 8:00 am

      The link doesn’t seem to work anymore, so here’s another one that should take you to the pilot’s statement.
      https://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms/search/document.cfm?docID=456609&docketID=60353&mkey=95009

      • Sarah A says

        April 17, 2019 at 9:16 am

        Thanks for that link and having also read the full narrative I could not agree with your conclusions. That synopsis that the NTSB prepared, which was parroted back in this article, makes the situation sound like a major stupid event rather then just a stupid event. It is disheartening that the pilot totally ignored the checklist for engine failure. I do not have a copy to recite from but I am sure it would include such basics as selecting an alternate feed position on the fuel selector to search for fuel while turning on boost pumps and such. Those are the very basic steps that any pilot should do automatically from memory without even taking the time to drag the checklist. Even the airlines have those short lists that the crews should have committed to memory as you do not always have the time to search for the right emergency procedure. If he had taken the time to pull out his flashlight and look at the fuel selector positions he would have seen that he really did have those 45 gallons and by switching both engines to that tank avert what could have easily been a fatal landing.

      • Sarah A says

        April 17, 2019 at 9:18 am

        Oh I meant to say I could not agree more with your conclusions. Sorry for that change in tone. I wish they would provide those links so we can get a look at the details and not have to relie on the synopsis which was very poorly written in this case.

  2. Brian K says

    April 16, 2019 at 2:25 pm

    Pull the parachute!

  3. Jim Denike says

    April 16, 2019 at 9:33 am

    Sounds like a real dumb attack or what’s known as an Amtrak commercial for his passengers. Says a lot for doing a station check every :12-:15 like we used to do in the early 20 Series Learjet (a fuel emergency looking for a place to happen). The station check included fuel, hydraulics, electrical, pressurization with weather updates every other check in case of sudden diversion.

  4. gbigs says

    April 16, 2019 at 6:29 am

    Another example why retractable gear is an obsolete and costly element of the old GA aircraft designs. Insurance companies know this and punish anyone who is unwise enough to try to own and operate one.

  5. Dave says

    April 16, 2019 at 5:54 am

    There are just too many jaw dropping decisions here. He needs to have his ticket pulled; retraining here is more than indicated.

  6. T Ibach Jr says

    April 15, 2019 at 4:21 pm

    who teaches these people how to think?? land off piste with 45 gallons of fuel???

  7. Slim says

    April 15, 2019 at 6:30 am

    I wonder how much fuel was actually remaining in the tanks when he landed? It sounds like he made an emergency out of nothing, and in a twin. If I were the FAA, it would be a re-ride with a heavy focus on flight planning and single-engine performance.

    “The pilot added there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.” UGH!

    • CJ says

      April 21, 2019 at 10:25 am

      My father would always say “that it was the fault of the nut holding the wheel.”

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines