• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Pilot hits fence after aborted takeoff

By NTSB · August 26, 2019 ·

According to the pilot, during the takeoff roll at the airport in Rexburg, Idaho, about 2,100′ down the 4,210′ runway, the airplane had accelerated to 65 knots.

The Beech C23 remained in ground effect for about 1,000 more feet, but would not climb.

The pilot feared the airplane would hit obstacles beyond the end of the runway, so he aborted the takeoff.

During landing, the airplane bounced, and when it descended back to the runway, the pilot immediately applied the brakes.

The airplane exited the left side of the runway before reaching the runway threshold. It continued about 120′ and then hit a fence.

The airplane sustained substantial damage to both wings and the lower left fuselage.

The METAR at the airport reported that, about the time of the accident, the wind was from 200° at 8 knots, and the temperature was 73°F. The field elevation was 4,862′, and the density altitude was 6,682′.

According to the Pilot’s Operating Handbook, under the reported weather conditions, the minimum ground roll was about 2,249′, and the minimum distance to clear a 50′ obstacle was about 3,701′. Further, the normal distance to land would have been about 901′.

According to FAA-H-8083-25A, The Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, Chapter 10 (Aircraft Performance) page 16: The most critical conditions of landing performance are combinations of high gross weight, high density altitude, and unfavorable wind. These conditions produce the greatest required landing distances and critical levels of energy dissipation required of the brakes. In all cases, it is necessary to make an accurate prediction of minimum landing distance to compare with the available runway. A polished, professional landing procedure is necessary because the landing phase of flight accounts for more pilot-caused aircraft accidents than any other single phase of flight.

Probable cause: The pilot’s delayed decision to land the airplane with insufficient runway remaining after realizing the airplane wasn’t climbing.

NTSB Identification: GAA17CA500

This August 2017 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines