• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Building an airport Tetrahedron

By General Aviation News Staff · December 4, 2019 ·

By JOHN CHIRTEA (And Many Others)

Call it a tetrahedron, or an airport wind indicator, the objective is just the same: It tells incoming pilots the direction of the wind.

At Eagles Crest Aerodrome (DE25), we decided that having one of these would be a great addition to the 3,500′ grass strip on our private 26-lot airport community in Milton, Delaware.

We started with the tail fuselage of a Bell 47 helicopter that was abandoned and hanging from the rafters of a hangar in our community.

The Bell 47 helicopter tail fuselage.

This appeared to be about the right size to act as a wind indicator, so it was trucked to my hangar.

Moving the fuselage to John Chirtea’s hangar to begin work.

A number of fellow pilot experts put their heads together and then the fun began. We never had a shortage of opinions as to how the construction should proceed.

But at about 20′ in length and cylindrical in shape, it did not seem to have enough bulk to be seen from the 1,000′ traffic pattern altitude.

To increase visibility from the air, a 3′ triangular winglet was added to each side. These were secured with a ¾” threaded rod that extended through each winglet, and bolted where it passed through the fuselage and secured with two supports located within the winglets.

The winglets were attached to a 1-1/2” aluminum bar that was bolted into the fuselage, and covered on each side with .060 gauge sheet aluminum. The aluminum sheets were pop riveted to the bar.

A finished rudder was donated by a fellow pilot and it fit perfectly to the large end of the fuselage. This entire assembly was then balanced on a round bar to determine the precise balance point. With the balance point, or center of gravity established, pillow block bearings were added to the bottom and top, inside of the fuselage, to act as the swing point.

The tetrahedron was then taken outside the hangar and installed on a temporary pivot bar to test how — and if — it would catch the wind. The location was close to a hangar, and as a result, it was catching quite a bit of wind bouncing off the hangar.

In fact, on a very windy day, shortly after setting it in place, it started spinning around the pivot like a drunken sailor at 30 revolutions per minute. We thought for sure it was going to go through our sun room windows.

It occurred to our panel of experts that perhaps it needed more rudder authority. So using some ¼” sheets of styrofoam — and a number of additional opinions — experimental pieces were added to the rudder. Various sizes were used, but none seemed to make a difference.

This led us to the conclusion that the upper pillow block bearing needed to be moved forward, which would change the center of gravity. This resulted in an upward tilt of the nose, and it seemed to do a much better job of tracking the wind.

Having done this, it was decided to relocate the tetrahedron to a temporary location where it would not be impacted by wind deflecting off the hangar.

Modifications at this point included adding tabs to the top of the rudder, adding tabs to the back of the winglets, and extending the fuselage by about 18″, using another piece of sheet aluminum. All of these additional changes led to it catching more wind, which was the original intent.

Additionally, to give the tetrahedron more rigidity, two bars were bolted to the bottom of the fuselage. Further support and strength was provided by adding iron bars inside the tetrahedron running parallel to the bars along the bottom.

At this point, we were satisfied with the performance of the tetrahedron and decided it was time to move it to its permanent location at the north end of the field.

The pivot for the tetrahedron.

Four threaded rods were assembled to be dropped into the concrete base. A talented blacksmith friend built a solid pivot to hold the tetrahedron. A 24″ sonotube was used as a form for pouring the concrete into a 3′ deep hole.

A 24” sonotube was used as a form for pouring the concrete into a 3’ deep hole.

Using a backhoe, the tetrahedron was picked up with straps and moved across the field to its final location at the north end of the field. A solid piece of 1-1/2″ stainless steel bar was used as the swing rod.

A backhoe moves the tetrahedron to its final location.

To give the tetrahedron a little character, four small metal pails were bolted to its end to simulate a rocket, and a rubber traffic cone was riveted to the nose.

After about five months of labor, 1,000 pop rivets, and many nuts and bolts, the tetrahedron is working exactly as it should.

The tetrahedron is working just as was planned.

It took a lot of trial and error, but we finally figured it out to our satisfaction, and incoming planes now have no difficulty in determining the direction of the wind.

The tetrahedron is working just as was planned.

It was an ambitious project, but fun was had by all the participants.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. SYLVAIN DE WEERDT says

    December 7, 2019 at 7:27 am

    I recal a operatiotal experiance in a fly ôut with rhe AIRCENT FLYING CLUB from MORET EPISY in the 1960 to a french unused airfield
    I landed as the first arriving airplan acording the TETRAHEDRON indicator but all the folowing airplane ALL landed in a differant direction acording rhe free rottating indication
    in function of the following discution afterwards on the ground whe found the very sensative TETRAHEDRON

  2. Jeff says

    December 6, 2019 at 5:36 am

    Very cool! Our airfield still has its Army Air Corps Tetrahedron from the 40’s. I examined it close up and was surprised to find the pivot point well forward of the center, perhaps at 1/3 distance from the nose. It also has a huge concrete counter-balance in the nose. Visiting pilots love seeing a “genuine” tetrahedron. After 75 years, it’s still reliable in all but the faintest winds. It would be great to see them make a comeback.

    • -JS says

      December 7, 2019 at 4:48 am

      Agreed. I would much rather fly in to an unmanned airport with a tetrahedron. You can actually see them from the air. Windsocks are often times very difficult to see, so runway choice is often a guess based on winds aloft.

      Building it with the pivot well forward and a counterweight on the nose to balance the tetrahedron makes it more stable in the wind and less prone to swinging around with small gusts.

    • John Chirtea says

      December 16, 2019 at 9:20 am

      Jeff:
      Moving the pivot forward was our solution to making ours work. With the addition to the rear end, it was so well balanced, it didn’t even need a counter weight up front.
      Thanks.

  3. mel says

    December 5, 2019 at 2:27 pm

    Looks Great; You should patent it and have something to do in your spare time

    • John Chirtea says

      December 8, 2019 at 7:55 pm

      Mel:
      There is no spare time when you build a tetrahedron!!

  4. Drew Mugno says

    December 5, 2019 at 2:11 pm

    All it needs is the airport radio frequency painted on the top

    • John Chirtea says

      December 5, 2019 at 6:29 pm

      We can do that!!

  5. Phil says

    December 5, 2019 at 11:00 am

    Now you just need a smoke generator in the tail. 🙂

    • John Chirtea says

      December 5, 2019 at 2:05 pm

      Great suggestion Phil, but I thought that might test the strength of the concrete base!.

  6. Bob says

    December 4, 2019 at 6:56 pm

    Looks like a Huey tail boom, not a bell 47.

    • Daniel Carlson says

      December 5, 2019 at 8:03 am

      Bell 47J or 47J-2. It had a covered fuselage & tail-boom. These models were manufactured between ‘55-‘66.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines