• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

GPS interference expected in Southeast U.S. during military exercises

By General Aviation News Staff · January 15, 2020 ·

The FAA has issued a flight advisory that GPS reception may be unavailable or unreliable over a large portion of the southeastern states and the Caribbean between Jan. 16 and 24, due to offshore military exercises.

According to FAA officials, the exercises require jamming GPS signals for several hours each day.

Navigation guidance, ADS-B, and other services associated with GPS could be affected for up to 400 nautical miles at Flight Level 400, down to a radius of 180 nm at 50′ above the ground.

FAA graphic in the Flight Advisory.

The flight advisory encourages pilots to report any GPS anomalies they encounter on this online form.

A report on the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association website notes that the association is “aware of hundreds of reports of interference to aircraft during events around the country for which notices to airmen were issued, and we consider the risks to GA aircraft highly concerning.”

“In one example, an aircraft lost navigation capability and did not regain it until after landing,” says the report from Dan Namowitz. “Other reports have highlighted aircraft veering off course and heading toward active military airspace.”

The wide range of reports makes it clear that interference affects aircraft differently, according to AOPA. In some cases, recovery from signal interference may not occur until well after the aircraft exits the jammed area.

In a January 2019 AOPA survey, more than 64% of 1,239 pilots who responded noted concern about the impact of interference on their use of GPS and ADS-B.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily. Sign up here.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. Dale Severs says

    January 16, 2020 at 9:04 am

    This is why I am keeping my ADF
    VOR’s are useless at low altitudes and long distances
    Navigating to an AM radio station near you!

  2. ManyDecadesGA says

    January 15, 2020 at 1:35 pm

    So much for this FAA (obsolete, unnecessary, overly expensive, foolish) WAAS LPV mess (now with approaching 100 GNSS SVs globally). Instead FAA should have invested in the combination of RNP (sensor independent with rho-rho radio updating logic included), networks of GLS/GBAS (e.g., via pseudolites), Kalman filtering with low cost inertial in FMSs, …that would not have faced this embarrassing long known potential GPS civil failure mode, even in the face of 1000 year solar flare threats. It could have even been done far less expensive, and vastly better capability as well as more robust, compared with some GA present typical still very expensive WAAS/LPV avionics boxes.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines