• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
General Aviation News

General Aviation News

Because flying is cool

  • Pictures of the Day
    • Submit Picture of the Day
  • Stories
    • News
    • Features
    • Opinion
    • Products
    • NTSB Accidents
    • ASRS Reports
  • Comments
  • Classifieds
    • Place Classified Ad
  • Events
  • Digital Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Student’s many questions distracts CFI

By NTSB · April 16, 2020 ·

The flight instructor was giving instruction in a Beech 76, a multiengine, retractable-landing gear-equipped airplane.

On the downwind leg in the pattern at the airport in Vacaville, California, he asked the pilot under instruction to perform a simulated single-engine emergency landing with the left engine shutdown.

It was the pilot under instruction’s first training flight in a multiengine airplane, and he asked a series of questions of the flight instructor during the procedure. The instructor reported that they both became distracted and forgot to extend the landing gear.

The airplane landed with the landing gear retracted and came to rest on the runway, sustaining substantial damage to the wingspar and longerons.

Probable cause: The pilot under instruction’s failure to extend the landing gear and the flight instructor’s inadequate supervision and failure to ensure that the landing gear was extended.

NTSB Identification: GAA18CA239

This April 2018 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

About NTSB

The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant events in the other modes of transportation, including railroad, transit, highway, marine, pipeline, and commercial space. It determines the probable causes of accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future occurrences.

Reader Interactions

Share this story

  • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit Share on Reddit
  • Share via Email Share via Email

Become better informed pilot.

Join 110,000 readers each month and get the latest news and entertainment from the world of general aviation direct to your inbox, daily.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Curious to know what fellow pilots think on random stories on the General Aviation News website? Click on our Recent Comments page to find out. Read our Comment Policy here.

Comments

  1. walter m krupnak says

    April 17, 2020 at 10:28 am

    As an instructor pilot, I always tell my students when doing critical flight manuevers, just follow me thru and we will discuss it in detail at altitude or on the ground.

  2. Manny Puerta says

    April 17, 2020 at 10:13 am

    One thing is for sure, the CFI will never do that again. Unfamiliar territory (if that were a factor) can be distracting. Given a proper level of judgment, intelligence and logic, nothing emphasizes success more than failure.

    I don’t know what the level of experience was with this CFI. Obtaining a CFI ticket, like obtaining a Private, is like a license to learn. Having the ticket in your pocket doesn’t mean squat until you exercise the privilege for awhile. Some CFI’s do OK during that post-checkride, experience gaining period. Others don’t.

    Looking back, I obtained my CFI when having less than 300 hours and 10 1/2 months total aviation experience time. It’s actually difficult to believe that a regulating agency would allow that little experience for the responsibility assumed. I learned a lot during that first year or two or three or four, etc. as a CFI. Knowing what I know now, I was severely under qualified by comparison. I was lucky.

    If he/she were an experienced CFI, then that is a different matter…perhaps one that involved choosing the wrong profession.

  3. gbigs says

    April 17, 2020 at 6:34 am

    How many excuses can you name for landing gear up in a retractable? Again, this is why insurance rates are MUCH HIGHER for retractable gear planes and why no one will insure you at all unless you log hundreds of hours with a CFI in one before even applying for said insurance.

  4. José Serra says

    April 17, 2020 at 6:15 am

    OMG!, how was such a thing possible with a CFI on board and teaching a student?

    • Jim Macklin says

      April 17, 2020 at 6:24 am

      Doing a simulated or real single engine procedure, whether air work or a landing REQUIRES ground instruction.
      Dual flight is dangerous because trainee and instructor can both distract the other.
      The BEECH DUCHESS BE 76 is a very easy airplane to fly. The fact it is so easy makes distractions even more likely.
      Doing a simulated engine out landing on the first lesson is plain stupid.

      • Warren Webb Jr says

        April 19, 2020 at 5:23 am

        Yes – when it is a training single engine approach, an engine shut down is a totally unnecessary risk. Feathering and restarting are part of multi-engine training, but do it at a safe altitude above the airport.

© 2025 Flyer Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Photographer’s Guidelines